My opinion is the Cubs but it depends on what year, this year I think the cubs are better according to the player stats. <----- to who ever said the cubs are better, screw you. the cubs even claim St. Louis to be Baseball heaven. to the original poster of the question, compare the team records and decide for yourself. the fact of the matter remains that the cards have won more world series' than the cubs and year for year the cards have a better win/loss record period.
nooo...
cardinal's are better than cowboys cardinal's have faster runners
Of course.
7 1) 2003 - Florida Marlins in Game 6 2) 1981 - Los Angeles Dodgers in Game 6 3) 1976 - Cincinnati Reds in Game 4 4) 1957 - Milwaukee Braves in Game 7 5) 1955 - Brooklyn Dodgers in Game 7 6) 1942 - St. Louis Cardinals in Game 5 7) 1926 - St. Louis Cardinals in Game 7
Yeah of course. The cards suck
Cause Peyton is garbage
Mark McGwire. Other than that I don't know.
No! The san Diego padres suck and the los angeles dodgers rule ! !
Yes. Ralph Lauren is good but Louis Vuitton is better in leather goods.
The san Diego padres suck! The los angeles dodgers are the BEST!
1956 St. Louis Cardinals vs Brooklyn Dodgers ProgramA 1956 St. Louis Cardinals vs Brooklyn Dodgers Program/Scorecard is worth about $30. -$45. In excellent condition. As with all collectibles, condition is the most important factor of all providing that the item is authentic. With programs/scorecards the slightest flaws will bring the price down significantly. An exceptional mint condition scorecard could sell for more.Common flaws would be staining, foxing (yellowing), fading, creases, rips, loose pages, cracked binding, and writing on the cover. Un-scored programs will generally sell at a higher price than a scored program but sometimes it doesn't effect value. The over all condition, and how well the cover displays will.
Washington University in St Louis is better than northwest Missouri