Best Answer

arousal is the amount of mental energy or preparedness a person has prior to performance

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago


This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Attention arousal set theory and sports performance?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Related questions

Describe drive theory?

At low levels of arousal, performance is low and performance increases in line with an increase in arousal.

Is the drive theory and you theory the same?

If by which you mean the Inverted-U Theory then no they are not. The drive theory suggests the relationship between arousal and performance to be linear, suggesting that as arousal increases as does performance. This has been rejected by most phychologists and adopted the Inverted-U Hypothesis. The Inverted-U hypothesis suggests that though there is a link between arousal and performance it is not linear, more likely an upwards parabola, or an upside-down or 'inverted' U. This suggests that as arousal increases so does performance but only to an optimal point, after which it begins to deteriorate.

Drive theory in physical education?

It indicates that there is a relationship between arousal and performance.

Definition of arousal in sport?

arousal in sport is your state of readyness before a match or a race if you ever have the feeling of needing a wee before a race thats arousal its a phsycological affect that is neither negative nor positive

What is the inverted U theory?

Yerkes and Dodson (1908) At low levels of arousal, performance will be below par, the athlete is not psyched up. As arousal increases so does performance, up to an optimal point. After this point, further increases in arousal lead to declines in performance. Each athlete has their own optimal level of arousal. Optimal arousal is higher for more simple tasks and lower for more complex tasks. Problems with inverted 'U' Theory * Critics question if optimal arousal always occurs at the mid-point of the curve. * One curve does not explain the different optimal levels of arousal needed for simple and complex tasks.

What is Donald Hebb's theory of optimal level of arousal?

Medium arousal is optimal for performance. Too much or too little arousal hampers performance.Optimal Levels: For easy tasks- at the higher end; For harder tasks- at the lower end (since too much arousal causes anxiety)

What is arousal hypothesis?

A very little has been accomplished towards developing different type of theory relating to human performance towards noise or illumination.

What are the Applications of excitation transfer theory?

Excitation theory is a misattribution of arousal.

What is Hans eysenck's inhibition and arousal theory?

Eysenck's inhibition and arousal theory proposes that individuals differ in their baseline level of arousal and their threshold for stimulation. According to this theory, introverts have higher baseline arousal levels and lower thresholds for stimulation, leading them to seek out quieter, less stimulating environments. In contrast, extroverts have lower baseline arousal levels and higher thresholds for stimulation, prompting them to seek out more stimulating environments.

How does Lazarus's cognitive-mediation theory differ from the Schachter-Singer cognitive arousal theory?

Lazarus's cognitive-mediation theory focuses on how cognitive appraisals of a situation mediate the emotional response. It suggests that when individuals appraise a situation as having personal relevance or as a threat, they experience emotional arousal. On the other hand, the Schachter-Singer cognitive arousal theory proposes that emotional experiences arise from the interpretation of physiological arousal, which is then given meaning through cognitive labeling. Thus, while Lazarus's theory emphasizes cognitive appraisals, the Schachter-Singer theory emphasizes the interpretation of physiological arousal.

Similar and difference between James-Lange Theory and Lazarus-Ishachler Theory of emotion?

These two theories differ more than they are similar to each other. The James-Lange theory argues that we experience the arousal from the event or situation first, and then we interpret the arousal and experience the emotion. Without the arousal there is no emotion experienced. The Lazarus theory argues that we must have a cognitive thought before any arousal or emotion is experienced. Without the thought there is no emotion experienced. These two theories are similar in the arousal that we experience before and during the emotion.

Which theory of emotion states both psychological arousal and emotion simultaneously?

cannon-bard theory