answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer
Roman Catholic AnswerI should think neither. Liberalist used refers to a political bent, and the Church has none. Literalist would usually refer to a reading of Sacred Scripture that only accepts the literal meaning. The Church definitely accepts the literal meaning, but it also accepts the spiritual, allegorical, moral, and anagogical senses of Sacred Scripture.
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is the Church liberalist or literalist?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is a bible literalist?

A bible literalist is a person who interprets the words of the Bible in a literal context.


Is Henry Ford a classical or modern liberalist?

Henry Ford can be considered a modern liberalist due to his focus on individualism, economic freedom, and limited government involvement in business operations. He believed in the principles of free enterprise and capitalism, which align more with modern liberalist ideals rather than classical liberalist beliefs.


How does a literalist look at the Bible?

A biblical literalist regards the Bible as infallible and without error. Any apparent errors and inconsistencies can and must be explained away, because the Bible is the Word of God.


What are the names of the political parties in Egypt?

national democratic party, socialist liberalist party, and ummah party


What words end with ist?

socialist, feminist, liberalist, communist, fascist, leftist, rightist, artist, dentist


What is the literalist approach to the presidency?

The Literalist Theory of the presidency states that presidents should only exercise powers that are specifically granted, or can be justly implied, by the US Constitution. This view was articulated by William Howard Taft, America's 27th President.


What were mazzini's ideas?

Educaton for all. Voting. And insurrection. He also part of the Young Italy. A very big nationalist and liberalist.


What is the antonym of conservative?

conservative, conservativist Antonym of liberal (Sense 1) =>liberal, liberalist, progressive srry if this dosent help!


What is 0.00482 expressed as two decimal places?

4.8 x 10-3 or, to a literalist, 0.48 X 10-2.


Who reads the constitution word for word?

A "literalist" would interpret the Constitution just as it is written, rather than interpret its meaning in context.


What is the difference between a literal reading of scripture and literalist readings of scripture?

For a Catholic, the literal reading of Scripture is one of the two senses of Scripture (along with the Spiritual Sense). The literal reading of Scripture takes into account who the human author was, in what era he lived in, and what form of writing he is using (is he using a parable or a story, or is he trying to present facts, or using an analogy or myth?) The literalist reading of Scripture has nothing whatsoever to do with the Church and is more associated with Fundamentalists. In other words, take the story of creation in the beginning of The Bible. God created the world in six days. Obviously, the author is not referring to "days" as we know them, because for the first "day" the earth, the sun, and the stars had not even been created yet. So we are obviously not talking about six twenty-four hour periods in which the sun circles the earth. The literalist would see "six days" and think "six twenty-four hour periods" without taking into account the fact that everything that establishes a "day" isn't even there yet. The literal reading of Scripture is trying to discern the truth that the Sacred author is trying to communicate. The literalist is taking the Bible as a scientific textbook, not a book about what God is trying to say.Literal or Literalist? Yes, Catholics DO take the Bible Literally! http://ryandunssj.blogspot.com/2010/01/literal-or-literalist.html


What are Islams gnostic and literalist components?

The gnostic component of Islam are the mystics, better known as the Sufi. The literalists are the Salafists (also incorrectly called Fundamentalists).