0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Fran
Professor
DevinIt would generally take more wave energy to deposit rocks compared to sand. Rocks are typically heavier and more resistant to erosion, requiring stronger waves to move and deposit them. Sand, on the other hand, is lighter and easily transported by waves, making it less energy-intensive to deposit.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Would it take more wave energy to deposit the sand or the rocks on the beach?
It would typically take more wave energy to deposit rocks on the beach compared to sand. Rocks are larger and heavier than sand particles, so they require more energy to transport and deposit onto the beach. Sand is finer and lighter, making it easier for waves to move and deposit along the shore.
What energy is falling rocks from the top of a mountain?
Potential energy is being converted into kinetic energy as the rocks fall from the top of the mountain. The higher the rocks are initially, the more potential energy they have, and as they fall, this potential energy is converted into kinetic energy, which is the energy of motion.
Would a marble have more potential energy or kinetic energy?
A marble at the top of a ramp would have more potential energy due to its position, while a marble rolling down the ramp would have more kinetic energy due to its motion.
What container has more thermal energy?
The container that has more thermal energy would be the one with a higher temperature. Thermal energy is directly proportional to temperature, so the container with a higher temperature would have more thermal energy.
Which celestial body would have more thermal energy: the moon or a black hole?
A black hole would have more thermal energy than the moon.
