Yes they are for a woods bike, not for a Motocross bike. I have owned 3 over the years and they have proven to be very dependable bikes. Here is the way I would break my most recent KDX (2003) 220.
Pros: Reliable, long lasting, descent power, inexpensive, lots of parts available, proven design (unchanged since 1997).
Cons: Soft and slow for more experienced riders, proven technology is also old technology.
No. As Kawasaki completely redesigned the kdx in 1989, and then once more in 1995.
about 4,500$
,028 to .032 in
I have an after market FMF pipe and silencer on mine.
4 miles and hour
26 KW
Yes, both years use a Mikuni VM32SS carb. Everything is identical with the exception of a larger main jet in the 84.
700 cc or .74 qt
Stock it would be 26-27 hp.
i run 40:1 in mine, i have the same bike
I have an Australian delivered 94 Model and it has a nikasil (sp) plated bore.
I have a 2002 model, and there is 0.70L stamped on the engine casing next to the oil filler cap.