in an anti communist view he was infamous like stalin but ina pro communist he was famous so it changes by view point
You probably shouldn't regardless.Another View: (in the US) of course you may. This country has freedom of speech and religion.
John W. Caldicott has written: 'Religious education and religious freedom, from a churchman's point of view' 'Unsectarian education'
For Lenin, the proletarian revolution, even though it should not be a national revolution, would by necessity take the form of a nation- wide revolution. This in turn establish a national socialist regime that would then touch off other revolutions world wide.
He viewed it as a necessary means to an end when defeating Imperialism.
Non religious people view divorce as a legal end to an unsuccessful marriage just the same way that many religious people view it.Non religious people view divorce as a legal end to an unsuccessful marriage just the same way that many religious people view it.Non religious people view divorce as a legal end to an unsuccessful marriage just the same way that many religious people view it.Non religious people view divorce as a legal end to an unsuccessful marriage just the same way that many religious people view it.
Freedom is just a word, a noun.. It doesn't have limits. But in a particular human society, there are freedom limits, limits which characterise its historical level from political, religious, moral etc...point of view. Democratic society, socialist society, Islamic society, all of them have their own limits of freedom.
In his publication of What Is To Be Done, in 1902, Lenin spelled out his reasoning on a key part of transforming Russia. On the left he had opponents who wanted to see a deterministic Marxism that would birth from a democratic or popular political process. Lenin was against this and argued that any revolution needed to be handled by professional revolutionaries like himself. Also, only the dictatorship of the proletariat as opposed to some parliamentary government could move history in the correct path.This doctrine is amazing in its total disregard of human dignity and a peaceful form of socialism. It would make Marx oppose such a view.
The Chronicles of Vladimir Tod is written in a first-person point of view, allowing readers to experience the story through the eyes and thoughts of the main character, Vladimir Tod.
The right to practice the religion of one's choice, or to be a non-believer. The persecution of men and women for their religious beliefs has a long history and is, even yet, far from universally eradicated. Religious freedom is certainly a right, but if it is a right but not a fact then it remains an unfulfilled dream. It can be put down on paper but if it is not implemented and practiced then the old ways of persecution and intolerance continue unabated. Furthermore, religious freedom can be elusive when people turn a blind eye to those who act intolerantly and operate in various ways to deny religious freedom to others. Religious freedom is also more possibly recognized in its absence than in its presence, in much the same way as we don't always appreciate health, but certainly notice it when we are sick. Of course since religious intolerance is generally frowned upon it often takes more insidious forms which all amount to the same thing. These forms can even include using all kinds of excuses or reasons to deny religious freedom, which is really part of, or akin to, the whole idea of freedom of expression.
Originally all that the wanted from the new world was religious freedom, but then wanted all the natives in the new world toconform to their religoin.
lenin believed in a small, all-powerful government.