Yes, Lenin did allow a limited amount of capitalism in his New Economic Policy. Lenin recognized that the Russian economy was more stagnant than it had been during the Tsarist regime. Agricultural output was down because of his "war communism" policy, which simply prompted peasant farmers to grow less produce and even destroy some crops and livestock. Manufactured goods were also in short supply. Lenin now faced the same shortages that prompted the February Revolution and the overthrow of the Tsar and later the October Revolution and the overthrow of the Provisional Government. He feared his own regime would be overthrown as well, so he re-introduced capitalism in the agricultural field as well as in small businesses in the industrial field. Ironic that Lenin, the communist, had to turn to capitalism in order to save the communist anti-capitalist system.
Lenin's NEP permitted what he called "petty capitalism" on a temporary basis only. Small companies (ones with about ten or less workers) and all peasant farmers were allowed to operate on a personal profit basis. The major industries were kept under tight government control. Many hard line Bolsheviks felt that Lenin was betraying the spirit of the communist revolution by retreating back into capitalism even though it was to a small degree. Lenin's feeling was it was better to take two steps forward and one back in order to maintain forward progress toward full communism.
I think you mean does your son need to be added to your insurance policy if her has a learner's permit. The answer is yes.
NO!
Lenin's New Economic Policy was the new direction of the Soviet economy. The Soviet economy was in shambles after the Revolution and Civil War. It was producing even less than it had under the Tsar and that was one reason why the Tsar had been overthrown. In order to rebuild the economy the NEP was instituted to permit "petty capitalism." Small business and peasant farmers were allowed to operate for their own benefit temporarily until the economy improved.
Yes, unless you are listed as an excluded driver. To be sure in the future have your parents add you to their policy. Provided you are 18 or younger, most companies will not charge you to be on your parents policy with just a permit.
Depending on the state, all states allow properly licensed young drivers with a learners permit to operate a vehicle. This is to assume that the young driver is listed on the policy as he should be as a driver on the policy.
You must be insured to drive a vehicle no matter what your age or if you have a learner's permit or regular license. You must be covered under a policy.
Most insurance companies will automatically insure a child in your home with a learners permit. It is best to check with your insurance company to be sure.
If you are in your parents vehicle and you are on their auto insurance policy, you would be covered.
Anyone driving a motor vehicle needs to be on an insurance policy. Contact your insurance carrier and have him added to your policy, or purchase a policy for him, whichever is cheaper.
He is covered under his parents' policy until he gets his own car and license.
Depends, do they have a drivers permit, if so, why not call the agent and have them put on the policy. If no permit, the policy wording is important, read it and see uner "insured" what it says, it may say any one who is a resident of your household, also, permission from the named insured is a factor. Best to get the person added to your policy and you won't have to worry about about it, worry about paying the increase in the premiun.
No, you can not get insurance unless you have at least one licensed driver on a policy.