Wiki User
∙ 12y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
from an airplane and from the top of the Empire State Building
In a vacuum where there is no air resistance, both the bowling ball and the napkin would fall with the same acceleration due to gravity. However, in the presence of air resistance, the bowling ball, being more aerodynamic, would fall faster than the napkin.
Both the bowling ball and the napkin would fall at the same rate in a vacuum because they are subject to the same acceleration due to gravity. However, the bowling ball would be affected more by air resistance than the napkin due to its greater mass and surface area.
In a vacuum chamber. C. On the moon.
In a vacuum, both a bowling ball and a napkin would fall with the same acceleration due to gravity, which is approximately 9.81 m/s^2. This is because in the absence of air resistance, all objects experience the same acceleration regardless of their mass.
Both the bowling ball and the napkin would fall at the same rate of acceleration due to gravity, assuming no external forces are acting on them. This is because all objects experience the same acceleration due to gravity, regardless of their size, mass, or shape.
In a vacuum chamber. C. On the moon.
a napkin on a table!!! a napkin on a table!!!
Filipino translation of NAPKIN: pamunas
napkin
Epal ang Iyong Style!~ <3
It can mean a few different things: - I'm bringing you a napkin (using the "usted" form, which is a formal "you"). - I bring you a napkin (again using the "usted" form). - I'm bringing him a napkin. - I'm bringing her a napkin. In the last two, the indirect object (who would be receiving the napkin) isn't stated, although it's perfectly correct to say the sentence in this way. It's more likely that the person receiving the napkin is you based on the context clues (likely a situation where someone is serving someone else food).