0
No, it is not very hard to prove. If you look up the part that states what classifies as labeling in the constitution act and match it to your situation a good judge would understand it and rule it for you. A bad judge would find ways to discredit it even though he or she knows that you are correct and within the law. Usually when they use it against you, it means that they are not being bias and they are with the other party and they are hoping for the other party to win. Going to hire courts won't help because if it is decided for you to fail all parties already agreed on it and it is a waste of time for you and a lot of negative energy that will drain you because they will keep it up until you are totally drained and eventually you give up or kill yourself from all the stress they have caused you and the realization that there is no justice in this world.
a good example of labeling that should be illegal under our law but is overlooked is when doctors label their patients and call it a mental disorder to bypass the law. There is no lupul to the law. A good judge with integrity should know that. Especially when someone is getting hurt by it. Another example is when the government calls regular good citizens that report illegal acts "whistleblowers". They should know that labeling is illegal. When a government official breaks the law the punishment should be double or triple the punishment of a regular citizen because they have studied the law, they know the law and they are in a position of power.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Libel is associated with what?
libel means when someone WRITES something derogatory about you you are able to sue that someone in court for "libel"
What evidence to you need to sue for defamation of character?
In order to sue for defamation of character, you will have to prove that your reputation was damaged due to slander or libel. You will have to present your case in a court of law.
Can you sue for malicious libel?
go to court.
Is libel illegal?
Libel is a civil issue. We tend to reserve the terms "legal" and "illegal" for criminal actions. In civil law, we use the term "liable". In other words, if someone is guilty of a libelous action, they are subject to liability for any damages resulting from the libel. You can file a civil suit for libel but make sure you can meet your burden of proof, and make sure you can prove your damages. Being angry over libel is not, alone, enough to take it to court.
How do you start a slander case?
Find yourself a good attorney and consult with them to determine if you even have a valid case. Slander and Libel are two VERY DIFFICULT charges to prove. The time, trouble, effort, and especially the cost, may not make it worth your while.
What are the four elements necessary to prove libel?
To prove libel, one must show that the statement was published, false, caused harm to the reputation of the individual or entity, and was made with actual malice (if the plaintiff is a public figure).
Can a verbal cancellation of your agreement still be be valid in court?
It would be very hard to prove that you had a verbal cancellation in court.
Can you sue the newspaper for malicious intent or emotional distress?
Yes but it is extremely difficult to prove libel because you have to prove actual malice was intended and that the newspaper knew the information was false but continued to publish it. Barely anyone wins libel cases because of the extremely high burden of proof on the plaintiff. A really interesting Supreme Court case in which many of the guidelines for libel and slander cases is New York Times v Sullivan... you may want to look it up.
Can you be charged with libel if you tell the truth about someone on a website?
If the information you share is true, it generally cannot be considered libel. Libel involves making false and damaging statements about someone that harm their reputation. However, it is always advisable to seek legal advice in such cases, as laws regarding defamation can vary.
Can it be libel if it can be proven to be true?
it is called "libel" if it is in print It is called "slander" if spoken. That would be decided by the court. It does not necessarily have to be an untrue statement. It could be defamatory and have adverse effects on someone. However if it is true and the court decided that way it would no longer be classed as libel.
Can Harper's magazine be sued for libel?
Yes, Harper's magazine can be sued for libel if it publishes false statements that harm a person's reputation. To win a libel case, the individual would need to prove that the statements were false, defamatory, and made with actual malice (reckless disregard for the truth).
What happens if you can prove that someone falsely accused you of a terroristic threat in Georgia?
You could attempt to file a criminal complaint alleging a "False Report To Law Enforcement"' or you could bring suit against the person in civil court for libel or slander.
