They should of killed or destroyed it But then they wouldn't help them when a battle came
The person who answered the question before this just annoys me with how critical they are being... then again, they are pretty straight forward and, well, truthful.
Sparta had no walls, relying on it's warriors as its walls.
Both Herodotus and Thucydides study the ideals that lead civilizations, like Persia, Athens and Sparta to war.
It was a war between leagues of Greek city-states, the Peloponnesian League led by Sparta versus Athens and its empire the Delian League. Athens lost after its naval supremacy was undermined by the Persian Empire providing the funds to the Peloponnesians to build a competitive fleet. Athens was defeated in the sea battle of Aigospotamai, its city besieged and starved into submission.
The name of the King that was fighting in the battle of the Marathon was Leonidas. I am not sure which King you are talking about, but this is Athens King.Reality:Leonidas was not present at Marathon since he is the king of Sparta and they(the spartan army) arrived late for the battle due to a festival. Athens was a democracy so it had no king. The only king that might have been present was the king of Plataea(the only greek city who helped athens) but history seem to have forgotten his name.Addendum:True, there were no kings at Marathon. Perhaps the first answerer is confusing it with the fight at Thermopylae ten years later, when the Spartan king Leonidas led the defence of the pass, or the battle of Plataea eleven years later when there were two kings present - Pausanias king of Sparta and Xerxes king of Persia.
It's in the book .stupid.
Athens, Thebes, and Sparta were the three most powerful Greek City-States.
Well, honey, Athens may have the brains, but Sparta definitely has the brawn when it comes to land size. Sparta's territory is larger than Athens on the map, so if you're looking for space to stretch your legs, Sparta's the place to be. But hey, size isn't everything, right?
If you are talking about Cities States and the Peloponnesian War is mainly because half of the states were in ally with Sparta and the other half were allies with Athens, plus some other neutral states. Sparta and Athens were the two dominant states back then, so when Athens started to gain more and more power, Sparta didn't like that. The possible reason why Sparta and Athens were in dispute all the time might be the governmental system, Sparta had an oligarchic system, and Athens a democratic system. Was like nowadays political parties.
A community on the Aegean Sea might choose to be an ally of Athens rather than Sparta because Athens was a maritime power, providing stronger naval support and protection for the community's trade routes and resources. Athens also offered democratic governance, which may have been more appealing to some communities compared to the stricter oligarchic rule of Sparta. Additionally, Athens had a reputation for cultural and intellectual development, which could attract communities seeking to benefit from such advancements.
If you ask an understandable question you might get an answer.
Sailing from Athens to Sparta is not a direct route since Sparta is inland and not directly accessible by sea. Typically, one would sail from Athens to a nearby port, such as Gythio or Kalamata, and then travel overland to Sparta. The sailing distance varies, but it might take about 1-2 days to reach the nearest port, and then additional time would be required for the overland journey. Overall, the entire trip could take several days depending on the specific route and conditions.
Sparta had no walls, relying on it's warriors as its walls.
Both Herodotus and Thucydides study the ideals that lead civilizations, like Persia, Athens and Sparta to war.
The halfway point between Orlando, FL, and Sparta, NC, is roughly near the area of Athens, GA. This location is approximately equidistant from both cities, making it a convenient meeting place for travelers. Depending on the route taken, it might vary slightly, but Athens generally serves as a good midpoint.
To keep a record of important dates
It was a war between leagues of Greek city-states, the Peloponnesian League led by Sparta versus Athens and its empire the Delian League. Athens lost after its naval supremacy was undermined by the Persian Empire providing the funds to the Peloponnesians to build a competitive fleet. Athens was defeated in the sea battle of Aigospotamai, its city besieged and starved into submission.
The question of whether Athens or Sparta should have ruled Greece hinges on their contrasting values and governance styles. Athens, with its emphasis on democracy, arts, and philosophy, offered a model of cultural and intellectual advancement that many found appealing. In contrast, Sparta's militaristic and disciplined society prioritized strength and order, which was effective for defense but less conducive to broader cultural development. Ultimately, the ideal governance for Greece might have been a balance of both city-states' strengths, fostering a society that values both democracy and military prowess.