The primary contribution in this regard is democracy.
In its early history, Greece was not united because of the isolation that was caused by the mountainous terrain.
In regard to ancient Rome, the first name that comes to mind is Julius Caesar. He was Pontifex Maximus.
Much of the Egyptian influence in Crete can be seen in artwork from approximately 4000 to 3000 years ago. Many Cretan statues have strong poses such as those commonly seen in Egyptian artwork. Also, a number of Egyptian cults (such as the cult of Isis) were found in Crete. The Minoan (Cretan) and Ancient Egyptian Civilizations had a high regard for one another and trade numerous items.
Some people regard the Middle Ages as beginning when the ancient times ended. Others have the ancient times ending in the middle of the 5th century, and the Middle Ages starting in the 11th. According to the first of these, the time between the ancient times and the Middle Ages is called the Early Middle Ages, but the later usage would have it be called the Dark Ages.
The Renaissance was the "rebirth" of art, science, and learning after the Middle Ages, especially with regard to the classical civilizations of Greece and Rome.
It was out of the way in the far north of Greece, high, inaccessible and often shrouded in cloud. They marked it as the home of the gods. In their usual pragmatic way in regard to religion, they were happy to banish the gods there well away from their own normal life in central and southern Greece.
The primary contribution in this regard is democracy.
As gods on earth.
In its early history, Greece was not united because of the isolation that was caused by the mountainous terrain.
Both the Aztec and Mayan civilizations are the most renowned in that regard. Both built cities, trade and infrastructure that rivaled the complexity of European cities at the time.
A cartouche in regard to ancient Egypt, was a person's name. Finding a cartouche for Cleopatra was important because it proved that she existed and was not a myth invented by some ancient writer.A cartouche in regard to ancient Egypt, was a person's name. Finding a cartouche for Cleopatra was important because it proved that she existed and was not a myth invented by some ancient writer.A cartouche in regard to ancient Egypt, was a person's name. Finding a cartouche for Cleopatra was important because it proved that she existed and was not a myth invented by some ancient writer.A cartouche in regard to ancient Egypt, was a person's name. Finding a cartouche for Cleopatra was important because it proved that she existed and was not a myth invented by some ancient writer.A cartouche in regard to ancient Egypt, was a person's name. Finding a cartouche for Cleopatra was important because it proved that she existed and was not a myth invented by some ancient writer.A cartouche in regard to ancient Egypt, was a person's name. Finding a cartouche for Cleopatra was important because it proved that she existed and was not a myth invented by some ancient writer.A cartouche in regard to ancient Egypt, was a person's name. Finding a cartouche for Cleopatra was important because it proved that she existed and was not a myth invented by some ancient writer.A cartouche in regard to ancient Egypt, was a person's name. Finding a cartouche for Cleopatra was important because it proved that she existed and was not a myth invented by some ancient writer.A cartouche in regard to ancient Egypt, was a person's name. Finding a cartouche for Cleopatra was important because it proved that she existed and was not a myth invented by some ancient writer.
In most of ancient Greece, women were not held in high regard, and were more or less property. As such, they were more or less forbidden to work or earn a wage, and an actor would have made money for his craft.
Your question is a tough one to answer especially in regard to laws. Rome and Greece were different peoples so their laws applied to their individual cultures. Rome would have to have an edge on Greece because Roman law was universal in the empire, while Greek laws applied only to the individual city-states. For example, a Corinthian would not be expected to abide by the laws of Sparta, and a Spartan would not be expected to live by the laws of Athens. As far as technology goes the two civilizations were about equal.Your question is a tough one to answer especially in regard to laws. Rome and Greece were different peoples so their laws applied to their individual cultures. Rome would have to have an edge on Greece because Roman law was universal in the empire, while Greek laws applied only to the individual city-states. For example, a Corinthian would not be expected to abide by the laws of Sparta, and a Spartan would not be expected to live by the laws of Athens. As far as technology goes the two civilizations were about equal.Your question is a tough one to answer especially in regard to laws. Rome and Greece were different peoples so their laws applied to their individual cultures. Rome would have to have an edge on Greece because Roman law was universal in the empire, while Greek laws applied only to the individual city-states. For example, a Corinthian would not be expected to abide by the laws of Sparta, and a Spartan would not be expected to live by the laws of Athens. As far as technology goes the two civilizations were about equal.Your question is a tough one to answer especially in regard to laws. Rome and Greece were different peoples so their laws applied to their individual cultures. Rome would have to have an edge on Greece because Roman law was universal in the empire, while Greek laws applied only to the individual city-states. For example, a Corinthian would not be expected to abide by the laws of Sparta, and a Spartan would not be expected to live by the laws of Athens. As far as technology goes the two civilizations were about equal.Your question is a tough one to answer especially in regard to laws. Rome and Greece were different peoples so their laws applied to their individual cultures. Rome would have to have an edge on Greece because Roman law was universal in the empire, while Greek laws applied only to the individual city-states. For example, a Corinthian would not be expected to abide by the laws of Sparta, and a Spartan would not be expected to live by the laws of Athens. As far as technology goes the two civilizations were about equal.Your question is a tough one to answer especially in regard to laws. Rome and Greece were different peoples so their laws applied to their individual cultures. Rome would have to have an edge on Greece because Roman law was universal in the empire, while Greek laws applied only to the individual city-states. For example, a Corinthian would not be expected to abide by the laws of Sparta, and a Spartan would not be expected to live by the laws of Athens. As far as technology goes the two civilizations were about equal.Your question is a tough one to answer especially in regard to laws. Rome and Greece were different peoples so their laws applied to their individual cultures. Rome would have to have an edge on Greece because Roman law was universal in the empire, while Greek laws applied only to the individual city-states. For example, a Corinthian would not be expected to abide by the laws of Sparta, and a Spartan would not be expected to live by the laws of Athens. As far as technology goes the two civilizations were about equal.Your question is a tough one to answer especially in regard to laws. Rome and Greece were different peoples so their laws applied to their individual cultures. Rome would have to have an edge on Greece because Roman law was universal in the empire, while Greek laws applied only to the individual city-states. For example, a Corinthian would not be expected to abide by the laws of Sparta, and a Spartan would not be expected to live by the laws of Athens. As far as technology goes the two civilizations were about equal.Your question is a tough one to answer especially in regard to laws. Rome and Greece were different peoples so their laws applied to their individual cultures. Rome would have to have an edge on Greece because Roman law was universal in the empire, while Greek laws applied only to the individual city-states. For example, a Corinthian would not be expected to abide by the laws of Sparta, and a Spartan would not be expected to live by the laws of Athens. As far as technology goes the two civilizations were about equal.
Declining animal and human birth rates and failing harvests are the problems affecting Thebes in "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles (495 B.C.E. - 405 B.C.E.).Specifically, there is a pestilence in Thebes. It is behaving as pestilences often do in ancient Greece: threatening the populations of all life forms and the production of crops. In ancient Greece, pestilences often are interpreted as divine pleasure over a human commission or omission in regard to the gods and their rules.
Both "in regards to" and "in regard to" are commonly used to introduce a topic or point of reference. "In regard to" is more grammatically correct as "regard" is singular, while "regards" is the plural form.
Contrast the results of the Persian and Peloponnesian war with regards to Athens greece