There isn't a specific answer to this question. Theoretically the difference between a full-back or half-back is simply a question of formation. The same player could be said to be in any of those positions depending on where he is in relation to other players.
In a standard Power I formation, where you have the quarterback behind the center, a back behind the qb and a second back behind the first back - you would have, in order:
Quarterback - Fullback - Running Back.
The same players in a formation, such as a Split back where the backs stand side-by-side behind the quarter back would yield:
Quarterback - Running Back - Running Back.
So it's merely a question of semantics.
In the current NFL, players who are often used as Full Backs, are traditionally used as blockers for the other running back. This player is often a larger running back. It's not uncommon to see these players block, receive passes and rush the ball.
Chat with our AI personalities
Yes, there are fullbacks in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Some notable fullbacks in the Hall of Fame include Larry Csonka, Jim Taylor, and Marion Motley. These players were recognized for their contributions to the game and their impact on the field as versatile and dominant fullbacks.
Jimmy Womack.
Yes fullbacks, halfbacks (this term is no longer often used), and tailbacks are all running backs. The fullback is usually the bigger running back in a two back formation, and although he does carry the football or catch passes on ocassion, the fullback is usually used as a lead blocker or to help protect the quarterback on a passing play.
mike alstott (retired) TBB Madison hedgecock NYG
The running backs along with Jerome Bettis were Fred McAfee and George Jones. The fullbacks were Tim Lester and Jon Witman.