No
Due to his reported use of steroids? Absolutely. Due to his documented and proven use of steroids? No. But, how many other records should be disallowed because of performance enhancement. Maybe many players have records who used enhancements that we don't know anything about. It is a very difficult situation for Baseball. But its only a record ... its not like it is anything that important.
No absalutely not. albert pujols is on his way there and he hasn't used steroids Barry Bonds is a cheater. BTW baseball records are very important because they stand for a very long time and that's how people remember baseball players.
There is no record of any professional baseball game played in 1846. The earliest records of baseball began in 1876 with the establishment of the National League.
No, he didn't. He signed a limited S-180, releasing the records once only, to three named reporters, who were not allowed to show the records to anyone else. That is not what he promised he would do, and as a result the public still doesn't know what's in the records (unless they trust those three hand-picked reporters to tell the truth).
A scrimmage is a game that doesn't count towards records or statistics. Like a practice game.
Most American League Cy Young awards. Clemens has 7.
No. Major League Baseball would be opening a can of worms if it tried to decide which home run records are valid or invalid.
yes because they used drugs to get the records
Yes. It will be reported on their credit records.Yes. It will be reported on their credit records.Yes. It will be reported on their credit records.Yes. It will be reported on their credit records.
No records exist.
No records exist
No records exist.
No records exist.
No records exist.
No records exist.
No records exist.
No records exist.
No records exist.
No records exist.