answersLogoWhite

0

According to Ambrose Bierce, revolution can be defined as the process by which a corrupt government is replaced by an even more corrupt government. History generally confirms this jaundiced view, however, now and then a revolution works out more successfully, replacing a corrupt government with a better government.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

RossRoss
Every question is just a happy little opportunity.
Chat with Ross
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
More answers

Since the first encounters, Indian-white relations have been largely characterized by hostility and violence, causing the term "Indian wars" to gain wide currency. The Indian Wars were a result of a clash of cultures that led to many short, bloody battles. There were rare stories of unprovoked American Indian attacks on innocent families that brought about outrage by the rest of the country. These violent acts led to the United States military retaliating against the tribe responsible.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

India was free

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

less food?

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Outcome of revolution
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp