While a general's win-loss record is a significant indicator of their effectiveness, it shouldn't be the sole measure of their greatness as a military leader. Factors such as strategic innovation, the ability to inspire and lead troops, adaptability in changing circumstances, and the impact of their decisions on long-term outcomes are also crucial. A general may achieve a high win rate through superior resources or circumstances, but true greatness often lies in their vision and the legacy they leave behind. Thus, a more holistic evaluation of a military leader encompasses both quantitative and qualitative aspects.
None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.
superior generals
40
Both were important
Brigadier generals in the military are responsible for leading and managing units of soldiers, making strategic decisions, and overseeing training and operations. They also play a key role in advising senior officers and implementing military policies.
During the American Civil War, but it is also true in most other military contexts, a general's win-loss record on the battlefield is, indeed, the best gauge for measuring his greatness as a military leader. It remains true that many excellent generals can be found among those who lost more times than they won, mostly because battles are not won solely through generalship: supply, morale, and political considerations may also have a decisive effect on battle-results.
None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.None. Nero was not a military man although he had capable generals under him to handle those matters.
The phone number of the Battlefield Military Museum is: 717-334-6568.
The address of the Battlefield Military Museum is: 900 Baltimore Pike, Gettysburg, PA 17325
superior generals
Republican
generals
The two generals were Tom Sawyer and Joe Harper
The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.
The US military has over 500 Generals - you'll have to be more specific.
ofcorse, where do you think the get their generals from?
three