0
No, yet he he has been falsely accused of it
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did Lance Armstrong lie about having cancer?
No, Lance Armstrong did not lie about having testicular cancer which spread to his brain and lungs in 1996. His doctors told him he had a 50/50 chance of survival when, in fact, they told him a white lie and the prognosis was far worse. Lance Armstrong underwent extreme chemotherapy and was given medications along with it. This could have contributed to the rumors he was taking other drugs to enhance his performance in cycling. In 1997 Lance Armstrong started the Lance Armstrong Foundation which provides education and care for cancer patients and the Foundation also funds cancer research.
Does Michael Myers do drugs?
He is given medication, but he himself does not do drugs.
Who is given credit to be the first to demonstrate scat singing?
Louis Armstrong
Is Billie Joe Armstrong Gerard Way's mentor?
Billie Joe Armstrong is not necessarily Gerard Way's mentor, but Billie Joe Armstrong has given Gerard Way plenty of advice before.
Immunosuppressive drugs are given after?
organ transplantation
Who is given credit for being the first to demonstrate scat singing?
Louis Armstrong
What name is given to a positive ion?
A positive ion is called a cation.
how many bracelets are there given out for free?
Organizations such as the Lance Armstrong Foundation may give out silicone Livestrong bracelets for free at events or for a small sum of money. Other organizations with a cause give out their silicone bracelets for free in order to spread awareness of what they a fighting for, a specific disease, a specific cause, etc.
Is negative blood compatible wiyh positive blood?
Negative blood can be given to someone with positive blood. Positive blood CANNOT be given to someone with negative blood.
Given the same technology teams and bicycles who would win the Tour de France between Lance Armstrong Greg Lemond and Eddy Merckx?
I am a huge Lance Armstrong fan, but I'd never bet against Eddy Merckx. While Lance has spent his entire career training only for the Tour de France, Eddy rode in almost every race he could and won a large majority of them. From the Cycling Hall of Fame website, you can find this information: "He won the Tour de France five times, the Giro d'Italia five times and the Vuelta a Espana once for a total of eleven Grand Tour victories. He won each of cycling's five monuments (Milan-San Remo, Tour of Flanders, Paris-Roubaix, Liege-Bastogne-Liege, Tour of Lombardy) more than twice, for a record of nineteen victories in these races." Eddy won 525 of the races he participated in, a record that will probably never fall. Additionally, Lance Armstrong has won his titles with a team that was built specifically for him, and with a team of engineers and other professionals who have dedicated years to making his equipment the best in the world. While I can't fault Lance for this, I have to believe that given the same conditions, team, and equipment, Lance would find himself watching Eddy pull away to an eventual victory. While Greg Lemond certainly made his contributions to the world of cycling, I simply don't feel that he is in the same league as Eddy Merckx, although he might give Lance a run if given the same conditions. Of course this is all my opinion, and there is absolutely know way to ever know for certain!
What are the drugs for Caldwell-luc procdure?
I was given Percoset
Why mars is given its name?
A guy on drugs named it
