0
How many times have the Washington Generals beat the Harlem Globetrotters?
Wiki User
∙ 16y ago
Yes. In fact, the Globetrotters have lost 345 games over the course of 81 years. However, with over 22,500 wins, the Globetrotters do own the best winning percentage in the history of professional sports.
Wiki User
∙ 16y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Ny times printed article on July 21 1932 on the reviveal of town of New Harlem what was the out come of this?
The Harlem Globetrotters?
Have the Harlem Globetrotters ever lost a basketball game?
No they never lost yes they have 153 times
Wilt Chamberlain touched the top of the backboard?
Yes several times, at kansas and with the Globetrotters
Why is an uncontested shot called a bunny shot in basketball?
According to recordholders.com, Harold "Bunny" Levitt of the Harlem Globetrotters made 499 free throws on 1935 April 6, a record that stood till 1975; his obituary in "The New York Times" of 2006 May 5 discussed his Basketball career, and said that he was 96 when he died.
Why is an easy uncontested shot in basketball called a bunny?
According to recordholders.com, Harold "Bunny" Levitt of the Harlem Globetrotters made 499 free throws on 1935 April 6, a record that stood till 1975; his obituary in "The New York Times" of 2006 May 5 discussed his basketball career, and said that he was 96 when he died.
When was The Washington Times created?
The Washington Times was created in 1982.
Who was the African American woman who founded the New York Times Harlem bureau?
eunice carter
How many World Series championships have the Washington national won?
yes p.s. my fav team ever.. they have won 3 times!
How many times did George Washington Carver move?
George Washington Carver moved 4 times
Did Hitler get his way?
Mostly he did. Especially at times that where important to his dreams. But, occasionally, reality set in and he was at times challenged by his generals. Not to mention the bitter end. ---
What was the main goal of the generals in the American Civil War?
To win the war. That said, different generals had different objectives at different times. You'll need to refine your question to get a better answer than this one.
Who gave the roman military orders?
The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.
