Well is should say that undertaker is better because he has done more in his cereer. Don't get me wrong Kane is a legendery superstar. But think about it The times when i see Kane dominent is when he was masked what was for about 6 years since then he started to lose hid dominance. as for the undertaker since his debut at Survivor series 1990 he was dominent he is also a great athlete for a person who is 45 years old he can jump over the top ropes. so im not saying Kane is not legendary im just saying undertaker is way more legendary than Kane.
look up the past matches with undertaker and Kane undertaker beat Kane 6 times Kane only three and Kane needed help for two of them
Chat with our AI personalities
The Undertaker, The phenom is stronger! Undertaker lost to Kane at night of champions then Hell in A cell followed by A buried alive match. The reason why this is is because Undertaker needed more time because he still had some injuries wearing on him espically his shoulder, He will return before wrestlmania and challange Kane I guess and regain his holy grail the world champion!And get his revenge on the Nexus. otherwise undertaker would have won all three of those paper views....... UNDERTAKER 4EVA
They are both bad! Undertaker and Kane are suck!
no they aren't, they are very good.
kane is the physically bigger and stronger man but hes not as talented as the undertaker
The undertaker is stronger then kane . And he will proved that when returns to wwe in october 23 2011 at wwe vengence to fued with kane . Officialy declared by wwe