Want this question answered?
Historians have different interpretations because they all have different opinions.
Bias can be useful to historians by allowing them to learn about people's opinions and beliefs.
It is important as historians to recognise the difference because opinions are not necessarily true, or what happened. You can have 2 or more opinions that go against eachother, but there's only one fact. Opinions also show more of the feeling of the time (whether people liked or disliked certain events), rather than what actually happened. Some effects that are fact, were sparked off by opinions, they are interlinked, but definitely different.
What are the different opinions about being a surrogate mather
They had different opinions on federation because not many people liked the goverment.
Different individuals have varying opinions on subjects. While other individuals may think Boy Scouts are "lame", I believe it is a useful character-building organization.
By giving free rein to diverse opinions.
Opinions may vary. For some organization, the following has to be considered: project feasibility, allotted budget and addresses organization's improvements or expansion.
Two people had a debate because they had different opinions
Political diversity is the different political opinions that people have. It is allowing people the right of having different political opinions and outlooks.
People have many reasons of what they have in mind. Some have different ideas but you can’t judge about what they think.
Historians have differing opinions on the precise date of the Buddha's birth but it was around the year 500BCE. He was born into a noble family in Lumbini, an area that today lies in the South of Nepal.