No
It is too dangerous to both individuals. The UFC is a commercial venture and the liability cost would be too high.
UFC, i was playing that game too :)
UFC 1 was in 1993. It was tournament format and featured some of the most brutal commentary the world has ever known. Watch it on video, considering how much the sport has grown its pretty interesting.
UFC has always been UFC
Actually this is incorrect. In the past people thought that the UFC too dangerous for women however recently more and more women have entered the world of MMA fighting. Some of the top women fighters are also signed to the UFC right now. In fact one of the recent UFC events - UFC 157 was headlined by the fight between Ronda Rousey Vs. Liz Carmouche for the UFC Womens Bantamweight championship which Rousey won in the first round by submission (arm-bar)
ufc becaue in ufc there is mixed but in boxing there isnt.
yes triple h has huge muscles to beat one up he beat big show and rock so he will beat up a ufc fighter anyway a tna or a boxer would would beat up a ufc fighter too ufc fighters train only an hour in gym but train longer on punching
It is an opinion but I LOVE THE UFC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UFC
Brutal justice is brutal justice...Brutal: A brutal act or person is cruel or violentJustice: The fairness in the way that people are treated
No WEC fighters are in UFC Undisputed, as they are not UFC fighters.