answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Do you have the wiring diagram for a Hyundai 36 volt 1204 controller????

You can download a complete manual, including the wiring diagram and instructions for testing and replacement, from Curtis Industries. This URL will take you directly there:

http://curtisinst.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=cProducts.DownloadPDF&file=1204_05.pdf

Or, if Wiki allows links, clik here. (PDF directly)

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: The wire diagram for a 36 volt Hyundai golf cart with a curtis 1204 controller?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Art & Architecture

What are all the factors for 362120?

The factors of 3624 are: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 151, 302, 453, 604, 906, 1208, 1812, 3624


What are the Normans social organization?

Norman Social Organisation and Feudalism Underneath all that mail beat the heart of a sensitive family manIt is important to remember, when talking about Norman social organisation, that both in Normandy and in Britain after The Conquest the 'Normans' as we think of them ie. cavalry bound mail clad warriors, tended to form the ruling elite. It wasn't that they were somehow a whole people separate and above the native population who were known as the 'commoners'. It is largely because of the top heavy nature of Norman social reportage that the lower classes were ignored. The 'fleeting' supremacy of the Normans left little time to dwell in literature on the people who supported the system. To enable such a professional warrior class, there had to be a culture where their none productivity had to catered for by excess production of food. A situation that applies to all societies that possess a standing army that needs feeding. They had their own terms for these lower ranks. In broad terms they are: The lowest of these ranks were the landless Serfs, bondsmen who laboured or looked after animals, approximately equivalent to a Saxon theow. Above the serfs were the Villeins, freemen who were tied to their lord's land, equivalent to the Saxon gebur. Next came the Cottars, men not tied to the land but expected to work for a local lord for one day a week, equivalent to the Saxon kotsetla. The highest of the 'non-military' ranks were the Freeholders who were not tied to a lord, much like the Saxon geneat.Of the 'military' ranks, the lowest rank was the Sergens, a professional footsoldier, literally 'one who serves'. Above the Sergens was the Vavasseur, a soldier who equated to a squire, and who would have probably served a particular knight. The knight or Miles was the lowest of the military elite, a well equipped and well trained fighting man similar to the Saxon thegn or huscarl. Over the Miles was the Baron, the lowest rank of the nobility and a senior knight. Above the Baron was the Comes, or count, responsible for a whole district or county, much like a Saxon eolderman, and directly serving the duke. Before the conquest of Britain the highest rank amongst the Normans was Dux, or duke, and the title' of Duke of Normandy' was held by the English Kings from 1066 until 1204.The term feudal is often associated with William and the Normans, suggesting a system whereby a tenant or vassal held land from the King or his superiors or Lord. In return, he was expected to render certain services or even military service. The term of such land holding is called 'fief' literally meaning ' in fee', a system of land holding that was popular throughout Europe until the end of the Early Middle Ages. The arrangement was such that as time went on, elements of these obligations of land tenure became more complex to include terms like 'feudal incidents', one of which is called a 'relief' which was the duty paid when a previous tenant had died. Often, the obligations were by and large commuted into cash payments, so that no physical liability took place, in effect becoming the start of regular rent payments. This in turn forced the troops that were up until that point semi professional with other responsibilities into truly professional troops.With the conquest, most of the land previously held by the various Thegns and Eorls was confiscated and placed into the control of the Normans and their Flemming allies. This in reality placed all this land under the control of the King, however, William only actually owned directly 15% of the lands, whereas a smaller group of wealthy Norman families and his 'Tenants in Chief' held 50% of the estates. By 1086, only two English Thegns still held land through the King. The Norman estates in England were often supplemented by estates held in Normandy as well, inflating the wealth of several key Norman families and those linked with William. These families were to become major players later on in the development of Norman England.As reward for service, William granted estates and parcels of land in the form of 'Honours'. Rather than being a single unit, these were usually scattered plots with a central point called a 'Caput' from the Latin, where we get the term capital. At this point, a castle was created for the Lord to reside, and to control his estates. The honours numbered 170 or so, with the smaller estates which were no big enough or important enough to be called honours, deemed to be 'Manors'. If the land of the manor was cultivated by the Lord, it was known as a 'Demense', even if it was cultivated by local tenants, again in return for rent or duties. In every estate, the system of obligation to your social superior stood, with the Serfs at the business end.The division of land by William to the various ruling Norman families helped to spread them apart, which was considered to be a political move on his part to control them, but is now seen as just a continuation of a Norman practice that was current in Normandy. Strategic areas such as coastal ports, beaches and the borders with Wales and Scotland had key blocks of land allocated rather than the scattered system he previously employed. This again mirrors practice in Normandy with the 'Compte' model, and this method became more entrenched as time went on, with William handing over more land into the grip of Normans whom he trusted above prior Anglo-Saxon tenants, Bishops and Abbots. Each of these areas of land controlled by his 'Tenants in Chief' ensured that sufficient men at arms were available for William, and it has been estimated that William could in times of crisis call upon the services of 5000 knights to serve in his army by this system. A Nomam knight from the time of the first CrusadeThe Knights themselves were divided into two categories. Firstly were the household knights, who resided with their honourial lord and rode with him as he went about his duties on his estates. The other group of knights were the 'enfeoffed' knights, who after a period of military service were granted land, and then continued to serve or paid rents or rendered other services to the King. The King's tenants of William, also created knights of obligation under them, and in the process created other problems for themselves as their own miniature private armies grew, as the maintenance of knights was not cheap. In later years, these miniature armies under the poor governance of weak Kings such as Stephen and John began to vie for power with each other in a period of real instability which England hadn't seen for hundreds of years. The effect to begin with was to ensure that the king was able to call upon a large professional army to shore up any question as to his right to run the country. Even William was not foolish enough to do without the system of hiring in assistance in the form of mercenaries. Post the Battle of Hastings, there were many men to be had for 'geld', just as there had been under the rule of the Anglo-Saxons. To ensure that there was sufficient to pay for such help, taxes could be levied to offset the expense of mercenaries, and in the latter days of William's expeditions in Europe, he had to levy some of the heaviest taxes that the nation had seen, which was never popular with the general populace. He could also employ the services of the Fyrd even then, as semi professional troops, just as had been the case in Harold's day, which could swell the ranks of his field armies by tens of hundreds.There were notable exemptions from the honour system known as 'book land'. Under the auspices of the Church, land could be held free of the responsibility required by ordinary folk. Owned by Thegns, this land could be held as long as certain duties such as fortress construction or maintenance, equipping ships, and guard duties were carried out. This ensured that the Thegns retained their status though, rather than their tenure on the land, making a subtle difference to that of the duties of Williams tenants in chief or vassals.We have not yet addressed the term Feudal. The reason for this is that it was coined in the 17th century to describe the state of play in England during Williams reign and the Medieval Kings who reigned after him. This term was used from the visual reference of the 1700's, and not during the Norman Conquest, for the simple reason that the subtle governmental system that Harold II had used and as his predecessors had done was unknown. It was historically expedient for 17th century historians to place an unfavourable social cut-off at the point of the conquest, which in fact was just the transfer of power from one social class to another albeit foreign one. The mathematics of it simply reflect this. Even with a conquering army of 7000, and a semi professional army of much the same opposing him, William could not wipe out thousands of farmers and the ruling classes. The change of rule may not have been all sweetness and light, but one good boss was just the same as another good boss, or even a bad one for a bad one.With the greater understanding of Later Anglo-Saxon culture, it's now fairly clear that the Normans should not be viewed simply as the evil and oppressive overlords of Robin Hood fame (a view which has more to do with the anarchic times of Stephen, John and Richard). Duty and obligation was the method the Saxons had used for hundreds of years, and this too was the system that the Normans employed. This meant that the Anglo-Saxon cultural system was easily able to absorb the new Norman social classes, so much so that not even the Norman language was adopted. William was just as likely to send in a force of men to quell any rebellion, as Harold would have done, he only really exceeded Harolds temper in the destruction of farmland and stores as in the 'Harrying of the North'. Something for which he was never forgiven, and rightly


What year was Kenmore sewing machine model 1320 made?

The 1320 model (158.13200) was built in 1973-74 and in 1974-75 the 1320 (158.13201) was built. Here is a link to the Sears archives pdf that has a list of all sears kenmore machines manufactured from 1934-1979. I could be wrong but I think that is when the last sears kenmore machine was made.Hope this helps.


What year was Kenmore sewing machine model 1914 manufactured?

Machine Model Identification Nomenclature Model Number Years Produced Kenmore Standard Rotary 117.101 1934 Kenmore Rotary 117.109 1934 Kenmore Rotary 117.111 1939 Franklin Rotary 117.113 1939 Franklin Rotary 117.1131 1948 Franklin Rotary 117.115 1939 Franklin Rotary 117.1151 1948 Kenmore Rotary 117.119 1939 Kenmore Rotary 117.1191 1948 Kenmore Deluxe Rotary 117.121 1939 Franklin Deluxe Rotary 117.123 1939 Kenmore Rotary 117.127 Kenmore Rotary 117.141 1948 Kenmore Rotary 117.159 Kenmore Rotary 117.169 1950 Kenmore Rotary 117.179 Franklin Deluxe Rotary 117.21 1948 Franklin Deluxe Rotary 117.217 Franklin Deluxe Rotary 117.227 Kenmore Rotary 117.231 1954 Kenmore 117.251 1954 Kenmore 117.252 1954 Kenmore 117.253 1954 Kenmore Long Shuttle 117.26 1938 Minnesota "E" 117.28 1938 Franklin Rotary 117.29 1938 Franklin Rotary 117.291 1938 Franklin Rotary 117.300 Franklin Rotary 117.301 Challenge Long Shuttle 117.32 1938 Franklin Long Shuttle 117.34 1938 SEWING MACHINES Machine Model Identification Nomenclature Model Number Years Produced SEWING MACHINES Kenmore Long Shuttle 117.36 1954 Kenmore Long Shuttle 117.361 1954 Minnesota "E" 117.38 1939 Franklin 117.4 1938 Challenge Long Shuttle 117.40 1939 Franklin Rotary 117.41 1943 Franklin Long Shuttle 117.42 1939 Kenmore Long Shuttle 117.46 1939 Minnesota "E" 117.48 1939 Challenge Long Shuttle 117.50 1939 Franklin Long Shuttle 117.52 1939 Kenmore Deluxe Rotary 117.55 1938 Kenmore Deluxe Rotary 117.551 1938 Kenmore Rotary 117.552 1954 Kenmore Rotary 117.560 1955 Kenmore Rotary 117.569 1955 Kenmore 117.580 1954 Kenmore 117.581 1959 Kenmore 117.582 1959 Kenmore 117.583 1959 Kenmore (or) Kenmore Imperial Rotary 117.59 1938 Kenmore (or) Kenmore Imperial Rotary 117.591 1942 Kenmore (or) Kenmore Supreme Rotary 117.592 1948 Kenmore Rotary 117.600 1938 Franklin Rotary 117.61 1938 Franklin Rotary 117.611 1938 Acc. Motor 117.617 1949 Acc. Motor 117.618 1949 Machine Model Identification Nomenclature Model Number Years Produced SEWING MACHINES Acc. Motor 117.619 1949 Kenmore Long Shuttle 117.62 1948 Acc. Motor 117.620 1949 Acc. Motor 117.621 1949 Acc. Motor 117.622 1949 Kenmore Standard Rotary 117.63 1938 Kenmore Standard Rotary 117.631 1938 117.640 (64) 1955 Kenmore 117.641 1955 Kenmore Rotary 117.65 1938 Kenmore Rotary 117.651 1938 Kenmore Deluxe Rotary 117.67 1938 Kenmore Deluxe Rotary 117.671 1938 117.700 1954 117.720 1957 Kenmore ZigZag Automatic 117.740 1956 Kenmore Deluxe Rotary 117.81 1938 Kenmore Deluxe Rotary 117.811 1938 Kenmore Deluxe Rotary 117.812 1948 Kenmore Deluxe Rotary 117.813 1954 Kenmore Model 83 117.83 1938 Kenmore Model 83 117.831 1938 Kenmore 117.840 1956 Kenmore 117.841 1958 Franklin Deluxe 117.85 1938 Franklin Deluxe 117.851 1938 Franklin Deluxe 117.857 1938 Frankline Deluxe Rotary 117.87 1938 Frankline Deluxe Rotary 117.871 1938 Kenmore Rotary Model "A" 117.89 1938 Kenmore Rotary Model "A" 117.891 1938 Machine Model Identification Nomenclature Model Number Years Produced SEWING MACHINES Franklin Rotary 117.91 1938 Franklin Rotary 117.911 1938 Franklin Rotary 117.93 1938 Franklin Rotary 117.931 1938 Kenmore 95 Rotary 117.95 1948 Kenmore 95 Rotary 117.959 1948 Kenmore 117.97 1952 Acc. Motor 117.9729 1939 Acc. Motor 117.97291 1940 Acc. Motor 117.9730 Acc. Motor 117.97301 1940 Acc. Motor 117.9731 1941 Acc. Motor 117.97311 1940 49 120.490 1950 49 120.491 1954 49 120.492 1954 49 120.60756 Decorator Attach 120.60763 Buttonhole Attach 120.60766 71 120.710 1955 71 120.711 1958 71 120.712 1958 71 120.713 1958 71 120.714 1958 76 120.760 1960-62 76 120.761 1960-62 1100 148.11000 1969-70 1101 148.11010 1969 1102 148.11020 1970 1104 148.11040 1970-71 1105 148.11050 1970-71 Machine Model Identification Nomenclature Model Number Years Produced SEWING MACHINES 1114 148.11140 1971-72 1115 148.11150 1971 1117 148.11170 1971 1201 148.12010 1968 1201 148.12011 1203 148.12030 1968 1204 148.12040 1961-71 1205 148.12050 1970-71 1205 148.12051 1970-71 1206 148.12060 1969-70 1207 148.12070 1969-70 1207 148.12071 1970-71 1213 148.12130 1972 1214 148.12140 1971-72 1215 148.12150 1971 1216 148.12160 1971-72 1217 148.12170 1971-72 1218 148.12180 1971-72 1218 148.12181 1972-73 1218 148.12182 1974 1219 148.12190 1972-73 1219 148.12191 1973 1220 148.12200 1972-74 1220 148.12201 1975-76 1221 148.12210 1973-74 1222 148.12220 1240 148.12400 1974-75 1250 148.12500 1974 1250 148.12501 1974 1300 148.13000 1968-70 1302 148.13020 Machine Model Identification Nomenclature Model Number Years Produced SEWING MACHINES 1302 148.13021 1968 1302 148.10322 1968-71 1302 148.10323 1971 1310 148.13100 1974 1310 148.13101 1974-75 1311 148.13110 1975-75 1322 148.13220 1972-73 1422 148.14220 1972-73 1422 148.14221 1973 1521 148.15210 1978 1560 148.15600 1976-78 1937 148.19370 1976 1937 148.19371 1976-77 1937 148.19372 1977-78 20 148.200 1963-65 21 148.210 1963-66 23 148.230 1966 23 148.231 1966-67 27 148.270 1957-58 27 148.272 1958-59 27 148.273 1959-62 27 148.274 28 148.280 1960-63 28 148.281 1963-65 29 148.290 1960 29 148.291 1960 29 148.292 1960-61 29 148.293 1961 29 148.294 1961-63 29 148.295 1963-66 29 148.296 1966-67 Machine Model Identification Nomenclature Model Number Years Produced SEWING MACHINES 39 148.390 1957 39 148.391 1957 39 148.392 1957-60 39 148.393 1960 39 148.394 1961 39 148.395 1961 40 148.400 1961-62 & 1967 42 148.420 1967 53 148.530 1966-67 53 148.531 1967 86 148.860 1958-59 86 148.861 1959-62 87 148.870 1961 1570 148.15700 1978 27 148.271 1957-58 87 148.871 1963 87 148.872 1963 1020 158.10200 1971-72 1030 158.10300 1970 1030 158.10301 1970-71 1030 158.10302 1971-73 1030 158.10304 1974-75 1040 158.10400 1971-73 1040 158.10401 1973 1040 158.10402 1974-75 1045 158.10450 1976 1050 158.10500 1974 1050 158.10501 1974-75 1060 158.10600 1977 1060 158.10601 1977-80 1069 158.10690 1979 Machine Model Identification Nomenclature Model Number Years Produced SEWING MACHINES 1069 158.10691 1979 1069 158.10692 1980 12 158.120 1965-66 1200 158.12000 1968-70 1202 158.12020 1968 12 158.121 1966 1211 158.12110 1977 1211 158.12111 1979 1212 158.12120 1225 158.12250 1974 1226 158.12260 1227 158.12270 1227 158.12271 1231 158.12310 1977 1231 158.12311 1231 158.12312 1237 158.12370 1241 158.12410 1241 158.12411 1247 158.12470 1975 1247 158.12471 1247 158.12472 1251 158.12510 1251 158.12511 1252 158.12520 13 158.130 1965-67 1310 158.13010 1968 1301 158.13011 1968-69 1303 158.13030 1969 1303 158.13031 1969 1303 158.13032 1969 Machine Model Identification Nomenclature Model Number Years Produced SEWING MACHINES 1211 158.12112 1985 ? 1303 158.13033 1969-71 1304 158.13040 1969 1304 158.13041 1970 1305 158.13050 1971 1315 158.13150 1971-72 1316 158.13160 1971-72 1317 158.13170 1972-73 1318 158.13180 1972-73 1319 158.13190 1320 158.13200 1973-74 1320 158.13201 1974-75 1325 158.13250 1336 158.13360 1977 1341 158.13410 1347 158.13470 1975-77 1347 158.13471 1351 158.13510 1357 158.13571 1358 158.13580 14 158.140 1965 1400 158.14000 1969-71 1400 158.14001 1971 1400 158.14002 1971-72 1400 158.14003 1973 1410 158.14100 1971-72 1410 158.14101 1972-73 1430 158.14300 1973-74 1430 158.14301 1974-75 1431 158.14310 1975-76 1451 158.14510 1976-77 Machine Model Identification Nomenclature Model Number Years Produced SEWING MACHINES 15 158.150 1965 1500 158.15000 1968-69 1501 158.15010 1968 1503 158.15030 1969-71 1504 158.15040 1970-71 15 158.151 1966 1514 158.15140 1971 1515 158.15150 1975 & 77 1516 158.15160 1971-72 & 1977 15 158.152 1967 1525 158.15250 1525 158.15251 1551 158.15510 1581 158.15810 16 158.160 1965 1600 158.16000 1968 1600 158.16001 1968 1601 158.16010 1969 1601 158.16011 1969-70 1601 158.16012 1970-71 1601 158.16013 1971 1602 158.16020 1971-72 1602 158.16021 1973 1603 158.16030 1971-72 1603 158.16031 1973 16 158.161 16 158.162 1621 158.16210 1976 1625 158.16250 1977 16 158.163 1967 1641 158.16410 Machine Model Identification Nomenclature Model Number Years Produced SEWING MACHINES 1649 158.16490 15 158.152 1967 1650 158.16500 1968-69 1651 158.16510 1968-69 1652 158.16520 1968-69 1653 158.16530 1968 1654 158.16540 1969-71 1660 158.16600 1976-77 1680 158.16800 1680 158.16801 1690 158.16900 1700 158.17000 1968 1700 158.17001 1968 1701 158.17010 1969 1701 158.17011 1969 1701 158.17012 1970 1703 158.17030 1972 1703 158.17031 1972 1703 158.17032 1973 1703 158.17033 1973-74 1720 158.17200 1975 1730 158.17300 1975 1731 158.17310 1749 158.17490 1968 1750 158.17500 1968 1750 158.17501 1968-69 1750 158.17501 1968-69 1751 158.17510 1968 1751 158.17511 1968-69 1752 158.17520 1968-69 1753 158.17530 1969-70 Machine Model Identification Nomenclature Model Number Years Produced SEWING MACHINES 1754 158.17540 1969-70 1755 158.17550 1970-71 1756 158.17560 1971-72 1757 158.17570 1972 1757 158.17571 1972 1757 158.17572 1760 158.17600 1976-77 1774 158.17740 1974 1774 158.17741 1974-75 1780 158.17800 1781 158.17810 1800 158.18000 1968 1801 158.18010 1968 1801 158.18011 1968-69 1802 158.18020 1968 1802 158.18021 1968-69 1802 158.18022 1969 1802 158.18023 1970-71 1802 158.18024 1971-72 1803 158.18030 1971-72 1803 158.18031 1972 1803 158.18032 1973 1803 158.18033 1973-74 1803 158.18034 1974 1813 158.18130 1974 1813 158.18131 1974-75 1814 158.18140 1974 1814 158.18141 1974-75 1815 158.18150 1976-77 1880 158.18800 1977 1913 158.19130 1976 Machine Model Identification Nomenclature Model Number Years Produced SEWING MACHINES 1914 158.19140 1975 1914 158.19141 1975-76 1914 158.19142 1976-77 1931 158.19310 1976 1931 158.19311 1976 1940 158.19400 1975 1941 158.19410 1975-76 1941 158.19411 1976 1941 158.19412 1977 1946 158.19460 1976 1946 158.19461 1977 1947 158.19470 1975-76 1947 158.19471 1977 1980 158.19800 1977 1980 158.19801 1977 1980 158.19802 22 158.220 1966-67 22 158.221 1967 32 158.320 1963 32 158.321 1963-65 33 158.330 1966-67 33 158.331 1967 34 158.340 1962 34 158.341 1962 34 158.342 1963 34 158.343 1964 35 158.350 1957 35 158.351 1957-58 35 158.352 1957-59 35 158.353 1959-60 37 158.370 1957 Machine Model Identification Nomenclature Model Number Years Produced SEWING MACHINES 37 158.371 1957 37 158.372 1957-59 37 158.373 1959 43 158.430 1961-62 43 158.431 1963 43 158.432 1963 43 158.433 1964-66 44 158.440 1957-58 44 158.441 1958-59 44 158.442 1959-60 44 158.443 1960 44 158.444 1961 44 158.445 1961 45 158.450 1958 46 158.460 1958-59 & 1961 46 158.461 1960 46 158.462 1960-61 46 158.463 1961-62 47 158.470 1958-62 47 158.471 1961-62 47 158.472 1963-64 48 158.480 1959-62 48 158.481 1963-64 50 158.500 1960-61 50 158.501 1961-62 50 158.502 1961 50 158.503 1962 50 158.504 1963-65 50 158.505