There is much evidence there were once dragons. Though they were most likely to be dinosaurs, in The Bible it is said(Job chapter 41) about a mysterious creature called the leviathan. It could be extinct, but check it out yourself! I also suggest you check out the website(answersingenesis.org)
Dragons were often depicted as living in caves because caves provided them with a dark and secluded environment where they could guard their treasures and remain hidden from humans. Additionally, the association of dragons with caves added to their mystical and fearsome reputation in folklore and mythology.
Archaeological evidence can include artifacts (objects made by humans), ecofacts (natural materials used or modified by humans), features (non-portable structures or remains), and sites (locations where evidence of past human activity is found). These different types of evidence help archaeologists piece together information about past cultures and societies.
Historians analyze evidence by examining its reliability, relevance, and context. They assess the source of the evidence, its bias, and corroborating or contradictory evidence to form a well-supported interpretation of the past. Additionally, historians use critical thinking skills to evaluate the perspectives and motives of the sources providing the evidence.
What evidence did the archaeologist find to suggest that the Tainos existed
Historians look for evidence to support their understanding and interpretation of the past. Evidence helps validate their arguments, provide context, and support conclusions about historical events and figures. By examining various forms of evidence, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of history.
An unsubstantiated claim. An unproven claim. Quackery. Conjecture.
There is no evidence that dragons ever existed in reality, so no.
psychbabble is unproven theory..is usually not supported by empirical data . psychology is based on evidence
A hypothesis is a statement of theory. Something that is unproven. You gather evidence to support that theory. Gather enough evidence to support and a theory becomes accepted as fact.
There has been no evidence of such an ancestor.
Solid evidence for the existence of dragons in the modern age has yet to be found, which is why most people consider dragons no more than fantasy. And because that's what they believe.
Unproven drugs are drugs that are against the law.
some people believe there were, but there is no scientific evidence that proves the existence of these creatures.
no!!!!!! Well, if you really want to know, there are komodo dragons, bearded dragons, water dragons. However if you want the four legged, two winged fire breathing variety then nobody knows. There may have been dragons alive many years ago but there is no evidence. There may even be a species alive today! Scientists say that there are probably hundreds of thousands of species of animals they haven't discovered, and dragons might be one of them. However in a skeptical view there has been no evidence of the existence of dragons found (but that doesn't mean it isn't there).
No. Whether or not one believes that dragons once existed, no evidence of any dragons has ever been found in Australia. The only "dragons" are dragon lizards of the family agamidae.
At present dragons don't exist. According to ancient literature of Chinese it is believed that dragons existed on Earth but no such scientific evidence has been found yet about the fire-breathing dragons.
Dragons are mythical creatures that do not actually exist in reality, so scientists have not found any remains of them. The stories of dragons are part of folklore and mythology, not based on actual evidence or scientific findings.