Your possibilities are good, but not Ivy League. Keep in mind that weighted GPAs mean nothing, SAT scores mean a lot, and extracurriculars help.
none there are 3,500 calories in a pound
By taking the wieghted averages of naturally occurring isotopes of that element. :)
Why is this filed under "Relationships"? And I believe it depends on your location. In the US it'd probably be tons, and in the UK it'd probably be kilograms.
By taking the wieghted averages of naturally occurring isotopes of that element. :)
74=((78*4)+(84*4)+(74*2)+(80*3))/(4+5+2+3)3.5=(4+5+2+3)/4
That really depends on the breed, age, weight, and health of the two animals.Most likely a dog would swim better due to it having paws and a more rudder like tail than a horse would.
if you use a wieghted bat before u hit then u are actually doing more harm than good. because the weighted bat has to use the red muscle fibers in your arm ur bat speed is actually slower. In your muscle u have to types of fibers white and red, red is for endurance and white is for quik and fast motions. In a baseball swing u have to swing quik rather than many times so swinging a weighted bat trains the wrong muscles and then when u get to the plate u use the wrong muscle fibers. Although it only effects about 1 mph on ur swing speed it still makes a difference
well, it depends on what sort of spaceship you're talking about. today's spacecraft is predominantly thruster power, but for unmanned probe missions it's also the probe itself, along with whatever companion vehicles it may have (i.e. orbital radio relay craft, accompanying repair stations and extra parts, etc.), while on manned missions alot of the payload is also food and supplies for the crew members, but all of these things must be weighed to the gram to calculate the exact ammount of fuel recquired to lift the weight(and not a drop more: the fuel is relativley heavy itself!). however, in the spacecraft of the far flung future, with their super efficient and readily available fuel, will be much more versatile. mining ships will be fitted with lasers and probes, space batle cruisers will be wieghted down with long range rockets, and exploratory vessels will carry whatever sort of "warp drives" we've developed by then. also, ammunition for railguns will be rather heavy. rather then lasers, as most people would beleive, most spaceships of the future will have railguns, which use rows of electromagnets to fire a high speed projectile at the desired target.
The atomic weight (not mass) of a chemical element is the ratio between the average mass of the atoms of this element to 1/12 from the atomic mass of carbon-12.The atomic mass is a term applied only to specific isotopes; the unit is the same as above. Is a value denoting the total mass of all the protons, neutrons, and electrons in an isotope.The mass number tells us the number (the sum) of protons and neutrons in the nucleus of an atom.The atomic number, on the other hand, tells us how many protons are in the nucleus of an atom.IUPAC publish periodically tables of atomic weights - the last edition is from 2009-2010.For the atomic masses of isotopes the last published edition is The AME 2003 atomic mass evaluation, edited by Audi, Wapstra and Thibault.