no
It's the same with womens football, womens rugby etc. TV companies don't think that people are interested in watching women play these sports but instead think we would prefer to watch men, and the annoying thing is, theres not a lot we can do about it.
808,000 people watched the 2009 All Ireland Football Final on RTÉ, Ireland's national TV station. However, around the world, many more people would have watched it, so it is impossible to give a complete answer.
because womens wanted to play football but didnt have the chance to so they had made there own football club
In seats filled,TV etc. in one setting it would be the Indianapolis 500, I used to watch, go there, but for me its not as exciting as Nascar.
Not very many people do in Australia, maybe 25% of the 20 million population of Australians would watch TV regularly. More during the football season and during the Commonwealth and Olympic Games.
In 1960's football wasn't like it is today. There was no NFL(not until 1974), so it would have been a college team. Since he was a Harvard graduate I would imagine it would have been them, but football wasn't on TV like it is today.
I would say basketball or football
A television would be used in a house or a place where people go.
Football. Fans and attendance at the events are two different things. It is impossible to know the actually fan base. But based on attendance it would be baseball by a wide margin, almost 5 to 1, but even then there are naturally going to be more people attending baseball games because there are way more baseball games played each year than football games. Then you have to look at TV and how many people watch the games. Most experts agree that Football has the most fans with baseball in second place.
Some people who are addicted to TV would suffer without it, but others who don't watch it much would feel happy with the world.
football players da
so people would not be so bord and so people would be on the there buts all day