The Olympics are typically chosen based on the host country's ability to be able to support an international competition like the Olympics. If Athens, Greece and Beijing, China have been selected as viable places, there is no reason on its face why Israel should not be chosen given that Israel can financially manage all of the preparations requisite to create an Olympic village.
However, given that many countries in the Olympics would boycott any competition held in Israel and would vote against Israel in the voting process, it is highly unlikely that Israel will ever host the Olympics. Additionally, it would seem much harder for Israel to guarantee the safety of the athletes given the near-constant conflict with Hamas.
yes
it shouldn't there's your answer
Well firstly your country has to make a video on why they should host it .
Auckland did not host the Olympics
because they are already tan and so the white should host the summer Olympics so they will be tan
It shouldn't be
No. Jamaica is not going to host the Olympics.
The city hosting Olympics should have a good infrastructure facility. It should be capable of providing the advanced security system for all those who attend the games. The nation's financial capibility to host the Olympics, also counts.
Israel sent 37 athletes to the Olympics games.
London was the host city for the 2012 Summer Olympics.
I would probably say 2008 Beijing Olympics. They had an amazing ceremony. You should watch the video of it on YouTube!!
There will be no games to be competed in by Israel in the 2010 olympics. There are also not athletes competing.