This is not true. From what I have seen girls are actually taking over sports, and I'm a guy.
It was a PE question, not my personal opinion :L :)
yes
yes there is a wider variety for boys (this was answered by a girl)
no
Because boys sports are more on contact and they need to buy more pads and things that protect them. Girls need less pads and equipment
Boys, because they have less fat tissues than girls have
yes because there more into sports so tehy brush there teeth less
Both genders are born with equal reflexes, but girls who play sports tend to have better reflexes due to the fact that their sports focus less on strength and more on agility.
Most of the advantages of single-sex education are for girls. There may be less risk of sexual assaults on female students from male students. Girls are more likely to speak up and participate when there are less boys around. There is the perception that boys are natural leaders and girls are more likely to be followers. Thus it is assumed that in that type of environment, the girls are content to let the boys do most of the participation. The jury is out on whether that is actually true, but that is one of the theories used in support of single-sex education. In single-sex schools and classes, the students are more sheltered from topics that are of little interest to them, and students learn very little when they are absolutely bored. Many girls (and a few boys) are not into sports, and classroom content centering around sports may be lost on them.
No girls stutter less than girls
There are 78 girls in the school. 66+12=78
They don't. They play differently. Boys generally play rougher than girls and speak less. The social skills between boys is less verbal and more large motor. Girls talk more and often negotiate what they will do in a game.
the word is competent, not compitent.