They are both about the same
The comparative is "more violent"; the superlative is "most violent".
futball(soccer in ireland) rugby( football except way more violent) and cricket(a weird baseball moderation).
Rugby!!! It's like hockey, but worse, and without ice. Youtube it!
Well, I'll say there is a more chance of dying in Rugby. Because it is a full contact sport, and players weigh around 120KG+, and they play full halves. Not to mention, - violent head clashes - possbilitiy of groin hits - studs could smash someones face - shoulder charge
More males watch Rugby then females.
Rugby Union players. They are better publicised on the world stage. They gain more money from sponsorship deals. Rugby Union is a more popular sport so people are more willing to pay to see them.
This a no brain-er HUNTING ... close second fishing ...I would probably say rugby or wrestling. football is America most violent sport no lie.
The Aztecs were more violent with sacrifices.
Studies have shown they do not make people more violent.
i believe that ice hockey is more violent but, football is up their
i would think motocross
Rugby union, or more specifically, rugby sevens.