answersLogoWhite

0

basically alex oxlade chamberlain should go to Manchester United because apart from the fact that valencia is injured this player has potential and look at how Rooney, ronaldo, van nistel rooy, beckham. cantona, scholes, nani, berbatov, charlton, giggs, tom cleverly, Danny welbeck etc. turned out because they are really good and alex oxlade chamberlain plays in the same position as walcott and he cant even be walcott's sucessor because walcott is not even old. what is the point of having 2 players that play the same but the younger one is dubbed the "new walcott". also arsenal fans say that arsenal don't need anyone because they are the best team in the world and that they have everyone but on the other hand Manchester united( the most successful club in the world) should get him because they make him live up to his potential or to the best of his ability. in other words arsenal don't need 2 players who are practically very much the same fighting for first team experience as well as an England call up and who is better. alex oxlade chamberlain is like a young walcott but maybe a super walcott because he is faster, he is a good goal scorer, winger, can play a central role, can cross the ball to team mates to provide an assist, he is a speedster( not only does he have fast pace but he can go past defenders like they are not there). but wallcott is slower, he is not really a good goal scorer, he is not rally a good winger because a winger's role is to provide assists so strikers can score, he is a speedster but he does not always get past defenders only sometimes and the odds are 40 out of a hundred (40/100) but alexoxlade chamberlain gets past defenders most of the times and the odds are 70 out of a hundred (70/100).

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?