If this is civil war related, the north won, not the south. And the north freed the slaves in the south.
The south was winning in the East and the north was winning in the West.
The north drove their tanks into the south's capital, winning the war.
It showed the north the south could fight and win, but also lead to over confidence.
No, the US was committed to not losing, which was entirely different then winning. It was never an attempt at winning a war, just deny the North a victory and prop up the South.
The partner who plays (The Declarer) is the one who first mentioned the suit that ends up as the trump suit. Example: South bids 1 Club. North, his partner, responds by bidding 1 Heart. If the final, winning bid is in Clubs, South will play because South was the first one to mention Clubs. North will be the Dummy. If the final, winning bid is in Hearts, North will play and South will be the Dummy. If the final, winning bid is in No Trump, Diamonds or Clubs, whichever partner mentioned it first is the one who plays.
To fight their hardest and never give up even though the North had better advantage.
the answer is Gettysburg
The North was winning at first.
The primary reason was that he was dead. His assassination is considered a blow to the South that delayed the reunification. Many atrocities were committed in the south by the winning north.
because the Republicans were the ones who freed the South because the North was the one who had control over the South after winning the Civil War.
South to north
Yes. The South did not declare war, although it fired the first shots - at Fort Sumter, a US garrison in part of a Confederate state The North had to declare war, invade and win.