Dane Swan 31st of May 2009 Round 10 with 48 possessions playing on Collingwood against Port Adelaide
56 possesions by Peter Featherby for Geelong against Fitzroy in 1983(not widely known as champion data does have records from that match but many Geelong Supprters have newspaper statistics to prove it) Then it was Greg Williams 53 possessions whilst playing for sydney against St Kilda in 1989.
They were left intact for him to return to if he was lucky.
In the days of Shakespeare there would be a fiddle player on stage. This was the fiddle player that the crowd would see. However, sometimes strings would break. So there would be a second person behind the curtain, offstage who played just as well as the person on stage. When the person on stage would break a string, he would continue on as if he were playing while the second fiddler would actually be what the crowd was hearing. No one ever saw or knew or applauded the second fiddler! So this is where that term came from.
What would happen is that your controller would not be in use but if you have a second controller, then it will change the to first player instead of second player.
Most people forced to choose just 3 possessions would likely pick:moneypersonal Identificationfamily photos and mementos
Immigrant possessions would be whatever an immigrant - a person moving from one country to another to stay - is bringing with them.
yes.
Yes, a foreigner in a new country can buy, sell, or trade personal possessions. If the foreigner came to a country with possessions, the person keeps them-- unless it would damage the country's ecosystem.
They were intended to house - not only the body of the Pharaoh, but also their possessions (including their slaves). This was in the belief that they would be resurrected inn the afterlife - and would need their possessions with them.
It would be difficult to compel parents to give personal possessions back to a runaway, for the following reason. It would be legally construed that if someone moves out of a residence and leaves some possessions behind, those possessions are abandoned. Certainly a runaway who leaves possessions behind in the home of a parent, has not made any agreement about the storage of those possessions. People are not legally obligated to store the abandoned possessions of other people whom they used to live with. That said, if you can manage to maintain some degree of civil relationship with your parent, that parent should be willing to return your personal possessions. It is the decent thing to do.
Mary's would refer to the possessions of one person called Mary, whereas Marys' would refer to the collective possessions of multiple people by the name of Mary.
Not at all; the antithesis of having great possessions would be having no possessions (or something of that sort, such as having few possessions). The idea of reducing your wants rather than increasing your possessions is just a way of taking a novel, and possibly more useful approach to the problem of how to satisfy your material desires.