answersLogoWhite

0

Of course he's better than Kobe. He was a better scorer, better defender, better in the clutch, had higher field goal %, more athletic, more creative and evolved his game throughout his career.

For those unfortunate souls that never had the chance to watch Michael Jordan in his prime, check out YouTube and watch game footage from his rookie year through 1993. The man was a force unlike anything the league has seen (yes, that includes today). There is no comparison. He was the smoothest, most dominant athlete I've ever seen in organized professional sports.

Certain commentators (yes you, Mark Jackson) with short memories and a tendency to be sensationalistic do the game a disservice and cheapen the "greatest ever" label by making these silly comparisons on an annual basis. I realize it's good for marketing and generates a response, but it's irresponsible. This constant topic: "Can so-and-so be compared to MJ?" needs to be put to bed.

Kobe probably entered himself into the "Top Ten of All Time" discussion by winning a title as the primary guy (no Shaq), but no, he's no Michael Jordan. He patterns his game after Michael Jordan - and you may see stylistic glimpses here and there, but it's a watered down version.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?