Lenin established a mixture of capitalism and free enterprise, allows some small factories and business to be privately owned; Stalin developed command economy that controlled every aspect of economic life and banned private ownership of farms, factories, and businesses. Lenin's government that took the land back and kept it under state control. Both governments were dictatorships Lenin interfered much less in the daily lives of the citizens. Life under Lenin involved less terror and oppression than life under more plentiful this progress came at a huge cost to the peasants forced to work on collective farms and to the Kulaks who were murdered or shipped to Siberia.
The immediate actions were the declarations of independence of almost all of the former soviet republics, all republics that wanted to stay with russia were annexed into russia and those that wanted independence instead became independent countries.
Nazi is the shortened form of 'National Socialist party'. Hitler's party, made infamous by cruel actions.
Julius Caesar's date of supreme authority was from 48 BC when he won the civil war, to his death in 44 BC. He had been elected consul previously and made dictator for a time, but these positions were acquired under the legal actions of the republic. His final dictatorship, the perpetual one, was the one that caused his death.
that is too simple, what would you consider unjust actions? is it something that disturbs the balance of the world and the world we live in? is it impiety? how would you define such acts?
It is not at all clear from your question which king, what actions, or whose actions you are asking about.
Implementing political reforms to increase representation for different ethnic groups, addressing economic disparities through fair resource distribution, and promoting dialogue and reconciliation among different communities could have helped Mikhail Gorbachev stop the unrest in the Russian republics.
Well its government was not under a socialist party, but the countries actions were considered socialist by their laws and implementation by improving social standards of the Poor and Middle classes.
The Chinese constitution accepts that China is a dictatorship. Article 1 of the 1982 Constitution states:"The People's Republic of China is a socialist state under the people's democratic dictatorship led by the working class and based on the alliance of workers and peasants."The word "dictatorship" features eight times in total throughout the constitution. The full text of the constitution is available in English at http://english.people.com.cn/constitution/constitution.htmlThe Chinese government can also been seen as meeting the modern description of a dictatorship through its actions. A system of dictatorship can refer to a ruling system which is absolute and unrestricted by law. The Chinese government is not fettered in its actions by a libertarian constitution in the same way that the governments of the USA and most western liberal democracies are.The constitution of China does not have any legal force against the Chinese government. Unlike western liberal democracies such as the USA, individuals in China do not have a forum, such as a court, in which to assert their constitutional rights against government actions.Furthermore, the Chinese constitution does not establish a separation of state powers, which allows for government action to go unchecked. This results in the rule of the government being unrestricted, which is by definition a dictatorship.
Dictatorship.
The immediate actions were the declarations of independence of almost all of the former soviet republics, all republics that wanted to stay with russia were annexed into russia and those that wanted independence instead became independent countries.
both
Nazi is the shortened form of 'National Socialist party'. Hitler's party, made infamous by cruel actions.
yes :)
an authoritarian regime or a dictatorship.
When analyzing a character's actions, it is important to consider their motives, the impact of their actions on themselves and others, and how their actions contribute to the overall plot or themes of the story. Look for patterns or changes in behavior that reveal more about the character's development and complexity.
Because if you don't you'll just move blindly forward without any thought for what might be the result of your actions.
Careless, as you use it, is one word. It's because they don't consider the result of their actions.