It would be the same because they line you up further ahead the more outside you get in the starting line to make up for the difference.
A stardard olympic running track is 400 meters from the inside lane, 500 meters from the outside lane.
The same way you measure it on the flat - with a distance-measuring wheel that clicks for every X meters. As for where to measure (as in the inside track is shorter than the outside), I'm not sure
Square meters is a 2D measurement, cubic meters is a 3D measurement. You need the third measurement to do the calculation.
Square meters are a linear measurement, cubic meters are a measurement of volume and are not compatible
The circumference of a circle with radius 6 meters is exactly 12 pi meters. If significant figures are important, the calculated length of 37,699111843077518861551720599354 meters must be rounded up to 40 meters
There is a significant amount of difference that can determine a race. There is about 50 meters difference if you run a lap on the inside, and one on the outside. This is why for distance runners they yearn to get the first lane.
Any measurement less than 100 meters is not equal to 100 meters
none, meters are a measurement of distance, a cup is a measurement of volume
Meters cannot be converted to meters cubed, one is a measurement of length, and one is a measurement of volume.
The circumference of that cylinder would be 31.4156 meters, and with a height of 4 meters, the outside surface of the sides would be 125.66 square meters. Does a cylinder have both an inside and outside surface? There is no thickness at all to the sides. Maybe it needs to be doubled, to be 251.32 square meters so we get both inside and outside surface, but I think not. A cylindrical *prism* would have a top and bottom, each having a surface of 78.54 square meters, for a total of 282.74 square meters.
You cannot. 4 meters is a measurement of distance and cubic meter is a measurement of volume.
Square measurement cannot be converted to linear measurement.