yes, they have less free time to try drugs and they know that if they do drugs, it will effect their playing skills.
A lot less then everyone thinks. Yes, there are kids that do them but there are also kids that don't. And just because some kids do drugs that doesn't mean all kids do. I don't and I'm a Teen.
It's less likely for children to get into drugs and alcohol.
depends, really. 13-14 year olds less likely than 15+
yes if it's natural drug it's less likely to kill you than a artificial one but just don't do drugs plz
The likely word is languages (dialects).Less likely is the similar word leagues, a measure of distance, or sport groups.
Taking drugs while pregnant may seriously deform your baby. Addicts are less likely to be able to keep their babies.
Fraud is a felony. Depending on what degree you can end up on probation (less likely), paying fines (extremely likely), jail time (also extremely likely).
They are less likely to become overweight, especially in later life.
Kids can take it easier than everyone else, show up to less practices, take breaks often. I would know because i have a heart condition and when i over work my heart just starts stining and i stop take a few deep breaths and keep going. Kids can get medications for these things if they wanna do a sport but they can try something else or do a little bit less than other kids their age.
No, it's the opposite. Marijuana and other drugs actually "dumb down" the brain and make you less likely to be smarter.
Some examples of non-vesicant chemotherapeutic drugs include paclitaxel, carboplatin, and doxorubicin. These drugs are less likely to cause tissue damage if they leak out of the vein during administration compared to vesicants.
If you have to travel half way across the country then you will be less likely to participate/continue to participate in that particular sporting activity. If however, that activity was on your doorstep there is a greater possibility you will participate in that sport.