They are actually the same game.
I've been playing basketball my whole life and I have gotten plenty of injuries. My cousin on the other hand, has been playing football and we have the same amount of injuries but his are more severe
i think soccer is more dangerous and causes a lot more injuries than hockey. soccer doesn't have that much equipment for protection compared to hockey. but for soccer if you had a lot of equipment it would be hard to sprint down the field, kick the ball and do other things involving the sport. hockey needs a lot of equipment because if you happened to fall on the ice the equipment protects you from the ice compared to soccer you would land on grass. hockey can be more life threatening with the fact of the blades on the skates but you'd think it would be rare to be hit with someones blade. same with soccer but your feet are in the air most of the time from running and kicking the ball plus you have to watch out for the cleats in case you run into them.
Yes, they would all be sports where players do get injuries.
It depends. Personally i would say football. But soccer can be dangerous too. I've played it for 9 years i would know. Then u have to think on who is playing the sport is it a 5 year old or a 20 year old. In 2006 418,260 children were sent to the emergency room with injuries from playing football. Soccer produced only 174,686.
football
Soccer, definitely!
Soccer is played 100 times more!
Soccer. Way more running.
a Soccer ball
David Sutherland Muckle is a British author known for his books on British naval history and maritime exploration. He has written several books on famous naval figures and events, including "Nelson's Sister: The Roya Navy and the Atlantic World," which explores the life of Horatio Nelson's sister, Susanna.
Football is probably more popular. (That's soccer, not American Football!)
Football.