No , the king cannot directly check the opposing king himself, since this would place the first king in check.
No, you cannot put a king in check with another king in a game of chess.
Yes, in the game of chess, a king can put another king in check.
Yes, in the game of chess, a king can put a queen in check if the queen is in a position where it can be captured on the next move by the king.
Yes, a pawn can put a king in check in a game of chess by moving diagonally to attack the king if it is in its path.
Yes, in the game of chess, the king can put the queen in check.
Yes, in the game of chess, a king can put a queen in check if the queen is in a position where it can be captured on the next move by the king.
No, you do not need to say "check" when you put your opponent's king in danger in chess.
No The rules state that one may never place his own King in check. Because a King can only move one square, it must be adjacent to a piece in order to attack it. But the act of moving your King adjacent to your opponent's King would be putting it in check. And so the move is not allowed. If your King is two squares away from your opponent's King, it is not attacking it, and thus it is not putting the other King in check. --CM
No , if your king is in check you can not counter with placing your opponent's king in check - you must respond to the move on your next turn by dealing with your king in check by moving the king out of check , removing the attacking piece by capture or by blocking the checking piece or you will need to concede / resign from the game . Look to the related link below regarding the rules of chess .
Any opponent piece, except the opponent king.
No, you do not have to say "check" when you put your opponent's king in danger in chess. It is not a required rule, but some players choose to say it as a courtesy to their opponent.
Yes, it can, as long as it doesn't put the king in check. PS, it's "capture", not "kill".