Yes they are alot better than the red skins
Redskins
cowboys are way worse. Redskins are better experienced players because of more established team. Tony Romo makes many mistakes and cant throw a stinkin ball. Steelers are better then them. All in all REDSKINS ARE BETTER .
Cowboys > Patriots > Redskins > Giants > Eagles
Redskins^^^That is incorrect. The correct answer is the Cowboys.The Cowboys have always been a better overall team than the Redskins, look at their history. Here are the FACTS:Cowboys have won the Super Bowl 5 times. 2 of those were back to back, and last time in 95 (I'll give you that it was a while ago). Redskins have won only 3 times, none back to back, last one being in 91 (even longer ago).Cowboys are a more valuable team than the Redskins, $1.65 Billion to $1.55 Billion respectively.Cowboys have played the Redskins a total of 103 times since 1960. Cowboys have won 61/103.Either the answer was from a Redskins fan, or someone who knows nothing about football.
the cowboys
Frankly, the Dallas Cowboys have dominated their series with Washington for the past 15 years or so. But Washington has acted as a spoiler several times.
cowboys
No, cowboys are not better than Indians, though some might believe they are. Of course, others might believe Indians are better than cowboys.
Hell Yea remember they have 3 superbowls if they were bad they wouldnt have those 3 lombardi superbowl trophies and NYG is way better beyond better than the PHI Eagles, cowboys, and redskins
This year. No
Redskins
Washington Redskins