Victor for sure.
While it's only slightly better performance-wise, it has far better upgrade potential than the Cybrid, and has a full metal body. Another thing is that sypders are stupid-easy to take care of, while the cybrid is more of a chore.
Almost all of them. You need to be much more specific in what you mean by "better" and ask a less open ended question.
Co2. Buying a Hpa tank for a cybrid is money that should be spent on a better gun.
The spyder victor is a more reliable gun than the JT. You should also look into the Azodin Kaos.
It is a low quality, cheap starter marker. It shoots, and that's about it.
Tippmann 98, very durable and easy to fix.
No. Cybrid makes very low quality markers. You will get a better investment saving money and buying a more expensive marker.
No, The Electra is Spyders "step up" from the victor. It is inside the same as the victor, but also has electronics and other features. The same with Tippmann, Azodin, and many other companies, they release a low, mid and "high" end gun together. The victor in this case is their cheapest and most "bare boned", then the Sonix, and then the Electra.
No. Cybrid has a reputation for poor quality guns that do not last after many games.
Air regulators, barrels, hoppers, asa, and trigger wells.
They are the same gun with slight variations. The sonix has a hand grip, clamping feedneck and different ASA hose and the victor is slightly cheaper because it doesn't have those things. Neither of these guns are very reliable or what could be considered "good" I would look into the Azodin Kaos before buying either one of these.
it is a very simple and basic gun.
no pirahnas are lower quality knock offs than spyder, they are not too bad for starters but spyder is better if you have a choice
No, it is semi automatic