no
No, he ll not be on a hat trick, as he has finished his spell, his wickets can t be carried over in the next match.
No. A hat-trick in cricket is three wickets from successive balls. That can span from the end of one over to the beginning of the bowler's next, although not across innings.
NO
The first bowler to take hat-trick in wc match was Jalal-ud-Din. He took hat-trick against Australia.
Four wickets on four straight deliveries is called a Double Hat Trick--the front three and back three wickets each constitute a Hat Trick.
In 1956, England spin bowler Jim Laker took 19 wickets for 90 runs (19-90) which set not only the Test record for best match figures but also the first-class one.[15] Laker's second innings analysis of 10-53 was the first occasion of a bowler taking all ten wickets in a Test match innings and they remain the best innings figures. Indian Leg-spinner Anil Kumble is the only other bowler to have taken 10 wickets in an innings, claiming 10-74 against Pakistan in 1999.[16]
Hat Trick started as a cricket term used to describe a bowler who took three consecutive wickets. The term is now used in other games and is often applied in soccer to a player who scores three goals in one match.
That would be a hat trick I believe (the first use of the word)
Dennis Lillee of Australia was the first bowler to take 350 wickets in Test Cricket. He achieved this mark in 1984 in the last match of his Test Cricket career at Sydney playing against Pakistan.
Because a sportsman's club used to mark the event by presenting him with a hat. A "hat-trick" is the taking of three wickets with three successive balls by the one bowler in cricket. The expression spread to other sports, such as football where it refers to the scoring of three goals in one match by one player.
chethan sharma
Chetan Sharma