this is a hard question to answer i would say anywhere between 35 and 50 percent maybe even a little higher all depends on coach
35%
they should only use instant replay for homerunes due to the many botched calls lately. but only for that and nothing elseAnother OpinionYes, Major League Baseball should use Instant Replay. They should use it for pretty much all judgment calls except for balls and strikes calls, balks, check swings and infield fly rules.
Instant replay or action replay is a video reproduction of something that recently occurred which was both shot and broadcast live. The video, having already been shown live, is replayed in order for viewers to see again and analyze what had just taken place. Some sports allow officiating calls to be overturned after the review of a play. Instant replay is most commonly used in sports, but is also used in other fields of live TV. While the first near-instant replay system was developed and used in Canada, the first instant replay was developed and deployed in the United States.
Many sports have been improved by technology, instant replay has revolutionized the sports, and made it easier for refs to make the right calls.
they didn't. They had to make on ice calls
He wants to remain friends with you.
Sometimes you can, but it is best to always stick to what the recipe calls for.
pelly
You may be able to use MagicJack, skype, or instant messenger
Man who calls Muslims to prayer. Correct spelling muezzin.
I would have a system similar to cricket, or rugby league or other sports with qualified umpires working as video umpires or refs. Umpires could call for assistance on close calls. You could also have teams being allowed a certain number of challenges at the discretion at the coach.
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
Verbal, body language, email, postal mail, phone calls, instant messaging...