a compound bow is shorter and uses pulleys to let the user holds the arrow back for long times.
A Recurve bow is more like a typical longbow, with less power than a compound, and doesn't use the advantage of pulley's. you are constantly holding back whatever poundage the bow has, and poundage cannot be adjusted. poundage for a Recurve is around 40-60, and a compound has around 50-100 draw.
It depends on your style. if you want fast firing, low power then the shortbow is better. vice versa for the longbow. I think that the longbow is better because if you can't shoot powerful enough, then what is the point of fast-firing? plus it looks more impressive.
you hit higher with a bow you hit low with a crossbow
Longbows can shoot farther and will cause more damage.
Originally crossbows took hundreds of pounds to pull them back and set them. They were also large and heavy. Long bows were light weight, carried by one man and much faster than a crossbow.
cross bow you crank back the string and then pull the trigger
long bow you have to string and pull back the traditional way
Introduction of the crossbow and the longbow made it possible for the English to defeat the French given their ability to penetrate plate armor.
The long bow was invented before the cross bow.
Both have a string and limbs
a radar hubb on top of the rotar \more advanced technology
what is the difference between khadi and handloom
difference between tally & fact ?
There is no difference between a donkey and a burrow
yes
No, the longbow shoots much further.
rune crossbow is a good crossbow. and dark bow is the best longbow.
the difference between a 2117 crossbow bolt and a 2216 crossbow is 99
A longbow was much lighter than a crossbow and provided a better rate of fire.
Yes
Crossbow, longbow.
Yes: arbalestier - from arbalest (crossbow).
French and Swiss armies favoured the crossbow. It was not liked in English armies, who preferred the longbow.
long bow
Long range, fair accuracy, less complicated design than the crossbow, faster reloading time than the crossbow.
The Crossbow bolt has more effect against armour at close range, but it is much slower to reload and has less range. As a mass of weapons the longbow is much more effective. Thus one crossbow is probably the better weapon, but if you had say 100 of each then the longbow is better because they could fire more shots at greater range. Certainly that's what Crecy in 1346 would suggest. The most skilled of the English Longbowmen could fire 8-10 shots a minute: the most skilled of crossbowmen could manage only 1 round every minute: most required a minute and a half to fire each round. Although both has their strengths, as pointed out above, the reason the Crossbow became popular over the logbow is mainly because the crossbow was so much easier to use: it took years and years to become proficient in the longbow (English people started their training as young boys) while the crossbow could be mastered quickly: it was a matter of point and shoot. It was the considerable experience/practice vs little experience/practice requirements that eventually saw a more widespread use of the crossbow.
Bolts from the crossbow can be stronger than a longbow but longbow's can shoot arrows from long range and crossbows are useful to kill people on PVP or to kill them on any knids of Mini - game.But in my opinion , crossbows was my idea to use for hitting harder.