0
Most commonly, the force of drag created by friction with the pitch or other surface will stop the soccer ball. A vector force exerted by a player may also stop the ball.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Caylee Craft
Ghd
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What would happen if you doubled the force acting on a moving object?
If you doubled the force on a moving object you would double its acceleration.
What is a force when neither object is moving?
that would be static friction.
Objects moving at a constant speed in a straight are said to be in?
Objects moving at constant speed in a straight line are said to be in equilibrium. That is there is no force acting on them. If a force was acting there would be aceleration and the velocity would change.
Why would a ball would never stop moving if you give it a push (apply a force to it) in outer space?
There is no force of drag or friction acting to slow it down.
Is wind a contact force or a non-contact force?
Wind is a non-contact force. But if someone is blowing on an object it would be a contact force because a person is causing the movement of another object.
If an object is not moving is the net force working on it zero?
That is correct. Any non-zero force would cause an acceleration (change of velocity).
Why you like being a soccer coach?
I would be a soccer coach cause I like soccer
Fastest moving field sport in Britain?
That would have to be soccer!
What kind of force would pushing on a wall but it not moving be?
stupid force
What would happen if you doubled the force acting on a moving object?
If you doubled the force on a moving object you would double its acceleration.
Would you use a balanced force or a net force to change the direction of the moving object?
net force
Does fluid friction affect soccer balls?
All friction affects a moving object, the source of the friction and the object moving is irrelevant. Water on a soccer ball would effect the performance of the ball.
What is a force when neither object is moving?
that would be static friction.
Why does gravity cause the planets to revolve around the sun instead of falling into it?
Actually, gravity is the force that would cause planets to fall into the sun. It is centripetal force that keeps the planets revolving and not falling. Centripetal force would cause the planet to fly off into space, while gravity would cause planets to be pulled into the sun. It is the balance of these two forces that keep planets in their orbits. ____________________________________ Newton's 2nd Law states that a body in motion, tends to remain in motion with a uniform velocity. That means that unless there is some sort of outside force, an object will continue to move in a straight line at a constant speed. Gravity is the "outside force" than bends the moving object away from its straight path into an orbit. Orbits are a balance between the attractive force of gravity and the momentum of a moving body. It's a delicate balance; if the object (be it moon, satellite or planet) is moving too fast, it will fly out into space, and if it is moving too slowly it will fall in toward the primary body.
Would there have to be an Unbalanced force acting on moving object?
There would have to be an unbalanced force put an object in motion but once in motion no force is necessary for it to remain in motion
Objects moving at a constant speed in a straight are said to be in?
Objects moving at constant speed in a straight line are said to be in equilibrium. That is there is no force acting on them. If a force was acting there would be aceleration and the velocity would change.
What is the upward force on a moving object with a lift at a rate of 17m per s?
If the object is moving at a constant speed, the net force on it is 0. So the upward force would have to be equal to the downward force (namely the weight of the object).
