Want this question answered?
No a Secondary Resource is totally different from a Primary Resource so it can't be the same. Primary Resource-The person who was there on that occasion Secondary Resource-The person who was not there on that occasion but knows a lot about it
secondary resource- are usually published by books or articles by authors who were not eyewitnesses of participants.
secondary resource- are usually published by books or articles by authors who were not eyewitnesses of participants.
Yes, it is a primary source.
Davinci's dick is primary and yours is lucky to be secondary
secondary
Yes! Because the energy can be renewable.
something that can be made from a primary resource
The advantages of having a biography as a secondary source is that less time consuming and costly to use. A disadvantage is that the quality may not be good and additional sources may be needed to get different viewpoints.
Jane O. Ejueyitchie has written: 'Reminiscences of a teacher' -- subject(s): Biography, Education, Secondary, History, Secondary Education, Teachers 'H.A. Ejueyitchie' -- subject(s): Biography, Government executives
Yes, the Hypatia biography had more primary sources than the Joyner biography. Hypatia's biography was based on first-hand accounts and historical documents from her time, while the Joyner biography relied more on secondary sources and interpretation of events.
A biography is considered a secondary source because it is a written account of someone's life created by someone else, rather than the person themselves. It is based on a combination of primary sources, such as letters or diary entries, and the biographer's interpretation of those sources.