Of course NOT! Actually it is not good idea to compare different sports, but statistic says that Badminton is faster and more intensive.
Match duration: tennis about 3 hours, badminton 1 hour.
Ball in play: tennis 20 minutes, badminton 40 minutes.
Shots: tennis 1000, badminton 2000
Distance covered by athlete: tennis 2 miles, badminton 3.5 miles
(note that badminton court 2.5 times smaller so badminton player runs reciprocally more intensive).
Compared to the moon, it's pretty strong. Compared to Jupiter, it's pretty weak.
Carnage is weak compared to the hulk
No, not usually compared with most plants like that.
It depends on what you compare it with. Compared to any of the planets, Pluto has a weak gravitational pull. Compared to other Kuiper Belt object, Pluto has a strong gravitational pull.
Weak acids have a larger value of pKa than strong acids
Oxalic acid is considered a weak electrolyte, compared to strong acids.
BOWLING BALLS ARE HEAVIER THAN TENNIS BALLS!!
Poor compared to what? Compared to a strong acid, yes, as the concentration of ions determines the conductivity. However a weak acid will conduct better than an insulator like polythene.