No. Cybrid has a reputation for poor quality guns that do not last after many games.
No. Cybrid makes very low quality markers. You will get a better investment saving money and buying a more expensive marker.
Ok, considering the last person didn't give you a good answer, here's mine. The paintball "marker" is the proper term for the gun. It's called a marker because it "marks" what it shoots.
yes, its a fairly decent marker
No. It is below even the standard for starter marker.
There are several paintball guns that are cheap and meet basic functions, none of them are "good." tippmann 98, azodin kaos, spyder mr1, are some of these markers.
It will preform the same as the bt4 and the tippmann 98. It is a beginner marker, so compared to the entire market it is not "good" I is however an excellent starter marker.
No. It is an entry level, mechanical, semi automatic marker. You can get better reliability from a tippmann or azodin of similar price.
tippmann army projet salvo is a very nice marker and it is 150
sakworldpaintball. There are no flash builders like the opsgear a5 builder for bt products
its a decent marker but a horrible value, for the money you can do much better in todays market
It is a decent marker, from a neutral standpoint. The price is pretty low, and it is a pretty tough marker. The only problem is that JT doesnt really produce it often, and aftermarket upgrades are rare.