I can't give you an exact answer but would guess it is pretty high ... in the 10 seasons between 2001-2010, 7 teams won 100+ games in the regular season and did not have a 20 game winner.
1) The 2009 New York Yankees won 103 games and C.C. Sabathia led the team with 19 wins. No one else had more than 14.
2) The 2008 Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim won 100 games and had one 17 game winner (Joe Saunders) and one 16 game winner (Ervin Santana).
3) The 2004 New York Yankees won 101 games and were led by Javier Vazquez and Jon Leiber with 14 wins.
4) The 2004 St. Louis Cardinals won 105 games and had one 16 game winner (Jeff Suppan) and three 15 game winners (Matt Morris, Jason Marquis, Chris Carpenter).
5) The 2003 San Francisco Giants won 100 games and were led by Jason Schmidt with 17 wins.
6) The 2002 New York Yankees won 103 games and were led by David Wells with 19 wins and Mike Mussina with 18 wins.
7) The 2002 Atlanta Braves won 101 games and had two 18 game winners (Tom Glavine, Kevin Millwood) and one 17 game winner (Greg Maddux).
A volleyball game typically goes to 25 points before a winner is determined. However, the winning team must be ahead by at least 2 points.
There are 65 teams who may enter the tourney, but the last two teams (ranked 64, and 65) will play a "play-in game," to enter the tourney. The winner will be placed in the 16th seed place to face the overall number one seed. This year, Moorhead State and Alambama State are in this "Play-In game" and the winner will be bracketed with Louisville.
There are 16 teams per each region; however, there are 17 teams for the region that holds the overall number one seed because the two teams play a game and the winner may enter the NCAA
115 game winning shots.
8
correct me if I'm wrong, but the team that wins the first game is approximately 70% more likely to win the second game due to the momentum of the winning team. EQUINEBOSS writes: When is the question being posed? Both teams have a 100% chance before the first game is completed. Once completed, one team (the loser of the first game) has a 0% chance of sweeping and the other team (winner of the first game) has only a 50% chance of completing the feat. Not taking into account the ability of either team, once one of the two teams has won the first game, it is simply a 50/50 chance of sweeping the double header by winning the second game. The reason we do not see many teams taking "both ends" of a doubleheader is also simple. Most teams play at or around the .500 mark in baseball. That being said, most teams only have a 50% chance of winning (or if you are a negative sort, a 50% chance of losing) any given game. Add in the desire and pride of a professional athlete not to lose twice in one day and it makes winning two games that much harder. But, that leaves math and starts adding in the human equation.
uuty757575757 uuty757575757
2 teams of 4 players :)
45 game winning drives
Because the leaders of the NCAA decided that no game would end in a tie. If the game is still tied after one overtime, the teams will play as many overtimes as it takes to break the tie and declare a winner.
Three (3)
* a USAV standard game plays to 25 points, but the winning team must win by a 2 point margin * in a deciding game the teams play to 15, and the winner must have at least a 2 point margin * if neither team has a 2 point lead up to/after 25, the game keeps going until someone is up by two. most of the time there isn't a cap, unless you're really squeezed for time