Rugby player but there are more minor injuries like ankle rolls, sprains, and pulls, but football players receive more serious injuries like breaks and season enders. Both sports receive their fair share of concussions and bruises. They are contact sports. Crap happens. When these things stop happening the sports are gonna disappear because people watch these sports for the contact and injury. So no football players do not get injured more than rugby players and vise versa. I play both sports and watch both sports. This is just an opinion, but I believe it is fairly accurate
Rugby players because they get more recognition
yes football players get more hurt than basketball players
All star cheerleaders get more hurt because they get tossed and football players don't really do anything.......
Rugby based on the stats as they are protected by very little armour
yes there is a hire possibility.
American Football is more violent than rugby because in American football you have 22 players crashing into each other while in rugby, except in a scrum, you only have people going after one player.
Football (soccer) started as a pro game much sooner and has been marketed world wide
Both Rugby League and Rugby Union, gaelic football, croquet, hurling, ladies football, camogie
Because Football pulls in alot more money than Rugby. More people pay to watch it on TV, they get higher attendances for matches, meaning bigger sponsorship deals, sell more merchandise and basically more people are interested in football & watch it.
Because it's a different sport
Cheerleaders Football players all the way!!!!!!!!Football is harder because one you get trucked, and two cheerleaders are on the side line for a reason so they don't get hurt. Football players defiantly get hurt way more. I'm not talking feelings!
Offense Because they get hit the hardest and don't really hit the defense