It's hard to say, generally soccer players all need to be very quick, but in Rugby some players do little running. Brian Habanna is probably the quickest rugby player in the world and may be quicker than Cristiano Ronaldo when running, however a 20st forward would be slower.
The quickest rugby and soccer players may be similar, but the slowest soccer player would be quicker than than slowest rugby player.
soccer beacuse its the best sport in the world, and mid fielders run a lot.
They are both the same.
Soccer does have more running them football🏈
Softball, Hockey and Soccer have 11 players in a team.
because is isn't rugby
Both sports are very fast. It is a toss up as to which is faster.
Yes, they would all be sports where players do get injuries.
Wayne Rooney and Ryan giggs
Not at all there are a huge number of soccer players and rugby players with size 13 feet.
In comparison to American football players and soccer players they certainly are not over paid but for the top players its considered that they may be under paid
Yes, soccer is by far the most played sport in the world, with hundreds of thousands of professional players.
soccer arobics is a way that soccer players can stay fit or at practice get in shape faster. Just like arobics the players keep moving to improve muscle building. In mls when the players are coming off injuries or from a break they go into soccer aronics. Which is soccer and arobics combined into one.
Rugby League Rugby Union Cricket Vollyball